• Log In
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • HomePage
  • About
  • Structure
  • Schedule
    • First Half of the Semester
      • Week 1: Overview of Course
      • Week 2: TCP/IP and Network Architecture
      • Week 3: Reconnaissance
      • Week 4: Vulnerability scanning
      • Week 5: System and User enumeration
      • Week 6: Sniffers
      • Week 7: NetCat, Hellcat
    • Second Half of the Semester
      • Week 8: Social Engineering, Encoding, and Encryption
      • Week 9: Malware
      • Week 10: Web application hacking, Intercepting Proxies, and URL Editing
      • Week 11: SQL injection
      • Week 12: Web Services
      • Week 13: Evasion Techniques
      • Week 14: Review of all topics and wrap up discussion
  • Assignments
    • Analysis Reports
    • Quizzes & Tests
  • Webex
  • Harvard Coursepack
  • Gradebook

ITACS 5211: Introduction to Ethical Hacking

Wade Mackay

The Home Depot reportedly ignored warnings from its own cybersecurity team

November 1, 2016 by Wayne Wilson 2 Comments

This article is a perfect example of upper management not taking IT security seriously. Even though this article is 2 years old it shows a blatant act on Home Depot’s part not to address known security issues. Home Depot cyber security team presented concerns to management back in 2008 and they were slow to respond, resulting in 56 million credit cards being compromised four years later. You would have thought after the Target data breech; Home Depot would have tightened up their act.

http://www.theverge.com/2014/9/20/6655973/the-home-depot-reportedly-ignored-warnings-from-its-own-cybersecurity-team

Filed Under: Week 10: Web Application Hacking Tagged With:

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Mauchel Barthelemy says

    November 4, 2016 at 8:06 pm

    I’m almost certain Home Depot is not alone with this sort of negligent corporate culture. I often times wonder what is the real motif behind not listening to IT/Cyber Security professionals. Perhaps big corporations get away with these bad habits the majority of times, or stricter rules and regulations need to be enacted in this regard? It looks like millions in fines alone are insufficient to convince otherwise.

    Log in to Reply
    • Loi Van Tran says

      November 6, 2016 at 3:05 pm

      I agree, millions in fines for a large corporation like Home Depot is not enough. They can brush it off and continue on with their business, unlike the victims that were affected by the attacks. I think that the atmosphere is changing since 2008 & 2014, and that Board of Directors and Executives are taking an active role in their organization’s cyber security posture. Unfortunately not all organizations are aligned with this practice, since there seems to be a knowledge gap and vested interest from the BoD and executives. For organizations to be successful in this relationship, BoD must provide oversight and guidance, and IT executives must be able to articulate the role of IT in business terms.

      Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Weekly Discussions

  • Uncategorized (133)
  • Week 01: Overview (1)
  • Week 02: TCP/IP and Network Architecture (8)
  • Week 03: Reconnaisance (25)
  • Week 04: Vulnerability Scanning (19)
  • Week 05: System and User Enumeration (15)
  • Week 06: Sniffers (9)
  • Week 07: NetCat and HellCat (11)
  • Week 08: Social Engineering, Encoding and Encryption (12)
  • Week 09: Malware (14)
  • Week 10: Web Application Hacking (12)
  • Week 11: SQL Injection (11)
  • Week 12: Web Services (10)
  • Week 13: Evasion Techniques (7)
  • Week 14: Review of all topics (5)

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in