• Log In
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • HomePage
  • About
  • Structure
  • Schedule
    • First Half of the Semester
      • Week 1: Overview of Course
      • Week 2: TCP/IP and Network Architecture
      • Week 3: Reconnaissance
      • Week 4: Vulnerability scanning
      • Week 5: System and User enumeration
      • Week 6: Sniffers
      • Week 7: NetCat, Hellcat
    • Second Half of the Semester
      • Week 8: Social Engineering, Encoding, and Encryption
      • Week 9: Malware
      • Week 10: Web application hacking, Intercepting Proxies, and URL Editing
      • Week 11: SQL injection
      • Week 12: Web Services
      • Week 13: Evasion Techniques
      • Week 14: Review of all topics and wrap up discussion
  • Assignments
    • Analysis Reports
    • Quizzes & Tests
  • Webex
  • Harvard Coursepack
  • Gradebook

ITACS 5211: Introduction to Ethical Hacking

Wade Mackay

Smartphone App Flaw Leaves Tesla Vehicles Vulnerable To Theft

November 26, 2016 by Mengxue Ni 5 Comments

Tesla cars can be tracked, located, unlocked and driven away by compromising the company’s smartphone app. Researchers at Norwegian app security firm Promon demonstrated how easy it appears to be to steal a Tesla. Benjamin Adolphi, mobile software developer at Promon, created a fake free Wi-Fi hotspot that featured an ad targeted at Tesla owners, offering them a free burger at a local restaurant. Owners were then prompted to download an application in order to take advantage of the offer; however, the app contained malware that “manipulated” the Tesla app to grab the owner’s username and password. An OAuth token is used to authenticate the username and password every time the user starts the app. The Tesla app is modified where code was added to steal the username and password and sent to an attacker-controlled server. In order to trigger this code, the user needs to log in again. The Tesla app can be tricked into requiring the user to log in by simply removing the stored token. In the statement to Inforsecurity, Tesla said that the issue uncovered by Promon is to do with underlying mobile application security, rather than their application.

It is great that I can control my car with my phone, but if it has the risk of someone can easily steal my car. I would rather not use the application. I think Tesla should definitely improve the security of the application instead of blaming all mobile application security problem.

Link: http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/smartphone-flaw-tesla-vehicles/

Filed Under: Week 13: Evasion Techniques Tagged With:

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jason A Lindsley says

    November 28, 2016 at 9:07 pm

    I agree that Tesla should continue to improve their application security, but I believe that the weakest link in this scenario (and most) is the user. It is difficult for app developers to develop apps that are secure enough to protect a completely compromised device.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Vaibhav Shukla says

    November 29, 2016 at 2:37 pm

    Its perfect example of week application security.I still have doubt when the app is stealing the Oauth token by taking away username and password which means that the values were not encrypted when they are being sent and it was like a man in middle attack

    Log in to Reply
  3. Arkadiy Kantor says

    November 30, 2016 at 12:52 pm

    I have heard of another vulnerability with people being able to steal a Tesla simply by resetting the owners Tesla account and creating a new password. While getting a car stolen is not fun I hope tesla does a good job at maintaining security for a car that is in motion, since any “hack” of a moving car with passengers in it can become deadly!

    Log in to Reply
  4. Mauchel Barthelemy says

    December 4, 2016 at 2:15 pm

    These type of innovations are good for convenience, but obviously not security-ready. This represents one of the reasons many consumers are reluctant to start using them. Tesla, Google and Apple need to work together for the common good of consumers’ safety and security.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Mengxue Ni says

    December 4, 2016 at 4:30 pm

    I agree with all of your ideas, although Tesla cannot fully protect their user from a compromise device, they still need to take some actions to secure the application. If they have done everything they can to protect customers, no one will blame them when hacking happens.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Weekly Discussions

  • Uncategorized (133)
  • Week 01: Overview (1)
  • Week 02: TCP/IP and Network Architecture (8)
  • Week 03: Reconnaisance (25)
  • Week 04: Vulnerability Scanning (19)
  • Week 05: System and User Enumeration (15)
  • Week 06: Sniffers (9)
  • Week 07: NetCat and HellCat (11)
  • Week 08: Social Engineering, Encoding and Encryption (12)
  • Week 09: Malware (14)
  • Week 10: Web Application Hacking (12)
  • Week 11: SQL Injection (11)
  • Week 12: Web Services (10)
  • Week 13: Evasion Techniques (7)
  • Week 14: Review of all topics (5)

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in