Kaspersky Lab is a nationally popular cyber security company that has found large popularity for its top quality services and products. Recently however they were accused of having ties with the Russian government because of Russian laws that ‘could’ be used to take advantage of its usage in the US government. Accordingly the department of Homeland Security stopped all agencies from using any Kaspersky products. Kaspersky is denying all allegations and labels them as inaccurate assumptions.
From a crisis management perspective Kaspersky seems to be doing the right things here: immediate and swift response, creating their transparency centers to bring together plans on reviewing source code with a third party contractor, and working with stakeholders to further solidify future transparency plans and compliance. I myself have used Kaspersky products and, while I acknowledge and respect how they are responding, the accusations made bring a great deal of worry from a domestic customer standpoint. Do I have anything I wouldn’t want the Russian government to see? No, (not really..) but, the fact remains it really shakes consumers from wanting anything at all from them.
What do you guys think about the Kaspersky brand, will it ever recover? How else could Kaspersky prove its innocence, or is it even innocent?
Adobe’s new software will utilize algorithms that use reference photos or drawings in order to apply a similar look to your photos and drawings. Another feature that Adobe is rolling out this year is automated colorization of black and white photos. The software will analyze a scene and then apply color with accuracy. Overall these advancements will make amateur photographers and selfie takers lives a lot easier thanks to the new Adobe software.
Earlier today, it was announced that Amazon received 238 proposals from cities to be the home to their new headquarters. Among that number are two local cities: Philadelphia and Bristol Township. Bristol is offering just below 300 acres of land for them to build on that is currently owned by Dow Chemical Company, who is looking to sell. Living so close to both towns, I might be a little biased but ultimately feel that either one would make a great fit for the new HQ. Here are some of the requirements:
- Metropolitan area with more than 1 million people
- Strong labor force with expertise in computer software development and engineering, executive management, legal, and accounting
- Access to mass transportation (airport, railroad, highways)
Do you think that the Delaware Valley is a good location for the next Amazon HQ? Do you foresee any infrastructural issues?
The company is expected to make its announcement in 2018. Whichever city becomes home to the new HQ can expect at least 50,000 newly-created jobs, and that’s not even considering the several thousand jobs created for the construction of the new facility.
I know most of us in this section are seniors, do you think the competition for skill jobs would be competitive? Do you think Temple and the other Philadelphia universities are create enough of a talent pool to compete in the race?
With the use of micro-optics technology, paper currency is becoming increasingly harder to counterfeit. The technology uses microscopic lenses to create images on the bills that will signal authenticity. Nearly 1 million of these lenses are used to magnify underlying micro-images on each of the newest $100 bills. When you tilt the bank note, Liberty Bells on the ribbon seem to change into the numeral 100. If you tilt the note left and right, the images appear to move up and down. If you tilt the note up and down, the images appear to move left and right. The quick method for validation makes it easier for humans to identify counterfeit bills on the market.
This is an interesting use of a technology, but to me it seemed unnecessary once I learned there is only an estimated $863,100 worth of counterfeit $100 bills in circulation.
Technology is now the root of improvements and automated solutions. In small businesses technology has an obvious benefit of increasing productivity to lower structure costs and some other benefits that can help the bottom line grow. Technology has allowed businesses to come up with an automated process that helps increase revenue and reduce costs, which is all possible with improved speed, the ease of sharing and storing information and a decrease in human error.
Speed and time are the two major aspects for small businesses to consider when dealing with big businesses as competitors. Being a smaller company quickly is important and IT has made communication and data sharing simple. Thanks to IT smaller businesses have the competitive advantage of coming up with a decision faster. Storing data is now easier and more cost-efficient. Being able to buy the exact space needed and storing it virtually is both saves the business money and allows sharing files easier, faster and more secure. Finally, automation eliminates the need to hire an employee in some cases for smaller companies, which allows them to save labor cost and focus more on current goals and strategies.
How do you think IT is affecting businesses today? and Aside from business how has IT made your personal life easier or more manageable?
Seoul has 25 million people in the city whichis halfof South Korea’s population. The United Nations predict more than 6 billion people will be in the world’s cities which is crazy to think. Seoul uses real time data to predict and control traffic. They gather information on buses, gps in taxis, and smart tickets in the subways to maximize efficiency.
When reading his article of how Seoul can use technology to control traffic it made me thinks of the future of autonomous cars. I can see traffic being controlled by the communication of autonomous cars. This may be far fetched but I can see cars communicating with each other so the traffic flow is smooth and efficient. This can also decrease or completely eliminate accidents. When a new car turns on and enters the road the traffic pattern will adjust by communicating with the new car.
With this I raise the question of, what do you see as the future of autonomous cars and/or traffic? Also, what are your reactions to my theory of autonomous cars communicating with each other to control traffic?
A new dashcam from Coban Technologies was announced last week that uses artificial intelligence to identify cars, people, and weapons. Sgt. Daniel Gomez, the leader of the LAPD tactical technology section, said that his department is testing one of the cameras and sees it being used for traffic stops and automatically identifying vehicles. He also says that the departments want to add facial recognition in the future if they’re allowed to since Coban Technologies plans on adding the feature in cameras anyway. This technology is concerning to those who feel like this is violating their privacy and the concept of police using facial recognition. I believe that it would be wrong for police to use facial recognition technology in their cameras because they could track and read any citizen even if they’re not doing anything wrong, although it could cut down crime. What is your opinion on these cameras using AI technology? Do you think this would cut down crime significantly enough since it would expensive to roll this technology out? What other artificial intelligence technologies do you think will come out soon?
Apple is teaming up with General Electric by creating a new SDK pack so that it can be used by developers to create applications on GE’s Predix (internet of things) platform. Apple and GE will give industrial companies the ability tap into the predictive data and analytics of Predix right on their iPhone or iPad. This will enable operators to have insight of their equipment in real time and enable them to collaborate if an issue arises. This will close the information loop, save time, money, and minimize unplanned downtime. These applications will be used for manufacturing, logistics, supply chain and so forth. In addition to this GE announced that it will giving its entire workforce iPhones and iPads. Apple is not really known for being a huge competitor in the enterprise environment this may help them capture more of a market.
Do you think this is a good idea for both Apple and General Electric?
Do you think the Internet of Things applications will benefit industries?
I was recently in LA visiting some friends and on a trip to Venice I stumbled across a store completely devoted to these new “Snapchat Spectacles”. I had never heard of such a thing and was completely taken back by the type of technology they had incorporated into a pair of basic sunglasses. I liked how TIME magazine started off their article about these by saying “you either get it or you don’t”, which I think is 100% accurate.
These glasses make it possible for snapchat users to take snapchats by utilizing the cameras within the glasses instead of using your physical phone. I’m curious to see if this trend is something that will take off in other industries such as GoPro, or at all.
I personally couldn’t see myself investing in a pair of these sunglasses specifically for the purpose of using a social media application but I could see how some people who are very involved in their social media may be intrigued by these.
Qualcomm has begun testing on the next generation of mobile cellular networking technology (5G). To test the speed they used their X50 5G modem that came out a year ago. Qualcomm says “the modem achieved gigabit speeds in this test, but it is capable of 5Gbps speeds once full 5G deployments are completed.” In able to ensure that the X50 modem worked with a smartphone environment, Qualcomm improved a new millimeter wave antenna that’s roughly the size of a nickle. The company says that it can fit two of these antennas in a smartphone, and though it is already the smallest millimeter wave design available, the plans are to shrink it by another 50 percent over the next twelve months.
To many people such as myself, we just naturally expect technology to get faster, smaller, cheaper every year (Moore’s Law). So telling us that our phones/mobile devices will just work faster isn’t going to get anyone jumping up and down.
The quick emergence of smartphones called for the demand of 3G for better voice capabilities and of 4G for more complex human interactions using voice and data. So now that the novelty is wearing off it’s unclear to see what big impact 5G will have on future networks.
What new features would you like to be able to perform on the new network?
What opportunities await?
In reference to current class discussions which one of the 3 categories of Christensen’s innovations would this technology fall under?
One theory or concept that I found cool was, ““Imagine getting video streams of a volleyball match or another sporting event then switching between the two from wherever you are using your mobile device,” “Today, 4G networks only let you view one at a time. 5G networks might allow you to watch both. Or if the game was covered using multiple cameras, you could get 360-degree perspective then zoom into what you really want to see.”