• Log In
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • HomePage
  • Instructor
  • Syllabus
  • Schedule
    • First Half of the Semester
      • Week 1: Course Introduction
      • Week 2: Meterpreter, Avoiding Detection, Client Side Attacks, and Auxiliary Modules
      • Week 3: Social Engineering Toolkit, SQL Injection, Karmetasploit, Building Modules in Metasploit, and Creating Exploits
      • Week 4: Porting Exploits, Scripting, and Simulating Penetration Testing
      • Week 5: Independent Study – Perform Metasploit Attack and Create Presentation
      • Week 6: Ettercap
      • Week 7: Introduction to OWASP’s WebGoat application
    • Second Half of the Semester
      • Week 8: Independent Study
      • Week 9: Introduction to Wireless Security
      • Week 10: Wireless Recon, WEP, and WPA2
      • Week 11: WPA2 Enterprise, Wireless beyond WiFi
      • Week 12: Jack the Ripper, Cain and Able, Delivery of Sample Operating Systems
      • Week 13: Independent Study – Analyze provided Operating System Samples and Create Assessment Report
      • Week 14: Deliver Assessment to Operating System Class either in person or via teleconferenc
  • Assignments
    • Analysis Reports
    • Group Project Report and Presentation
  • Webex
  • Harvard Coursepack
  • Gradebook

MIS 5212-Advanced Penetration Testing

MIS 5212 - Section 001 - Wade Mackey

Fox School of Business

Most IT pros fear IoT cyber attacks. Few are doing anything about it.

February 26, 2018 by Donald Hoxhaj Leave a Comment

http://www.zdnet.com/article/most-it-professionals-fear-iot-cyber-attacks-new-research-suggests-few-are-doing-anything-about/

Cyber-attacks have been continuously breaching security rules in IoT. In a recent survey conducted, it was found that 97% of the respondents believed that unsecured IoT devices can be harmful for their organizations, while only 29% actively monitored the systems for any 3rd party breach. Where organizations are failing is they understand the adoption of IoT and are able to scale well, but fail to understand the risks posed by such systems in their networks. Lack of clear accountability when it comes to third-party IoT risk management is another big issues that remains unattended

The research that was conducted on more than 600 respondents revealed the fact that about 38% believe that no one in their organization is responsible for reviewing the risk-management policies of third-party vendors. The biggest challenges with respect to IoT Risk Management Practices consist of the fact that 49% do not keep inventory of IoT devices and 56% do not keep inventory of IoT applications. More than 53% of the respondents depend on contractual agreements with external 3rd party risk management vendors. Another alarming fact that came out is that only 29% actively monitor 3rd party IoT risks. There is a clear gap in educating the employees about the risks of leaving IoT open in the network and not taking care of it.

Filed Under: Week 02 Tagged With:

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Weekly Discussions

  • Uncategorized (10)
  • Week 01 (18)
  • Week 02 (9)
  • Week 03 (13)
  • Week 04 (17)
  • Week 05 (12)
  • Week 06 (16)
  • Week 07 (2)
  • Week 08 (8)
  • Week 09 (5)
  • Week 10 (10)
  • Week 11 (5)
  • Week 12 (5)
  • Week 13 (2)
  • Week 14 (7)

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in