If the application security coding principles meet the following, it should be possible to determine that the application development team uses security coding practices:
1、The application should know what is coming in.
2、The application should be structured and written with good flow and
controls.
3、The application should only call the trusted resources.
4、The application should limit access to the data only as needed for the
program logic and processing.
5、The application should guard what is being sent out.
I believe the following methods can be considered to determine if the application development project team is using secure coding practices:
1. Contact and interview the application development team, which includes process knowledge, application functional knowledge, known secure code practices and vulnerabilities, etc.
Review application security scorecards and PT, SAST, and DAST reports
3. Review change management procedures
4. Understand the application development environment in which the application is developed and deployed and identify the security risks associated with it.
I will refer to NIST Special Publication 800-218 and assess whether the team has followed the recommendations outlined in the document. For audits, I would review the policies mentioned above and then assess whether the team is following them. For example, if the company uses a code analysis tool to review code, I would look for reports from that tool that correspond to when developers push code. If the organization does not have an automated analysis tool, I would look at code review sessions and find documentation of when past sessions occurred, such as reviewer comments on pull requests.
According to the SANS Application Development Techniques and Tools white paper, code review and peer review can help uncover errors that lead to input validation. The paper cites the following examples that can be identified during a review. “If URLs are used as data types, it is also important to validate the existence of such URLs. Failure to validate input can expose applications to cross-site scripting and similar attacks.
To determine if an application development project team is using secure coding practices, company should conduct a thorough code review to assess if the team is following secure coding practices. Identify any potential vulnerabilities or insecure coding patterns. What’s more, they also should perform security testing, such as penetration testing or vulnerability scanning, to assess the robustness of the application against common security weaknesses. And evaluate if the team follows industry best practices, coding standards, and compliance requirements related to security. And during these points, the team’s collaboration and communication regarding security aspects also should be evaluate.
First, a thorough code review is required to assess whether the team is following secure coding practices and, at the same time, to identify potential vulnerabilities, insecure coding patterns. It is also important to assess whether the security team is professional and compliant, and whether their cooperation and communication is smooth and effective.
The following methods can be used to determine whether an application development project team is using secure coding practices:
1. Review the usage code of the project team to check whether security coding practices are used and whether there are loopholes and malicious code;
2. Review the application security scorecard and PT, SAST and DAST reports;
3. Understand the development environment, deployment environment and application environment;
4. Check whether the project and the team are operating in compliance.
If I were checking if an applications development project team was using secure coding practices, I would first examine their process during the testing phase. The project team should be running checks against their application for the most common vulnerabilities as outlined by SANS, such as SQL injections, buffer overflows, format strings etc. If the team isn’t checking for these vulnerabilities, then the most likely were not considering this during the planning and development phases of the application. The secure coding practices need to be followed while the code for the application is in development.
I review the strategies mentioned above and then evaluate whether the team followed them. For example, if a company uses a code analysis tool to review code, I look for reports from that tool that correspond to when developers push code. If the organization does not have automated analysis tools, I look at code review meetings and find documents from past meetings, such as reviewer comments on pull requests.
According to the SANS Application Development Techniques and Tools Whitepapers, code reviews and peer reviews can help catch errors that cause input validation. This article cites the following examples that can be identified during the review process. It is also important to verify the existence of urls if they are used as data types. Failure to validate inputs exposes the application to cross-site scripting and similar attacks.
One of the ways to determine if an applications development project team was using secure coding practices, is testing by validation and verification as this will provide an objective and independent view of the secure coding.
Another way is by logging and auditing to give reasonable assurance.
To determine if an application development project team is using secure coding practices, we can perform the following steps:
1. Review the project documentation. Check that the project documentation includes security requirements, design specifications, and coding standards. These documents should outline the security measures that the team plans to implement throughout the development process. 2. 2.
2. Conduct a code review: Review the code written by the development team to ensure it complies with coding standards and best practices, looking for common security vulnerabilities.
3. Conduct vulnerability testing: Conduct vulnerability testing of the application to identify any security weaknesses.
4. Check for secure coding techniques: Check that the development team is using secure coding techniques such as input validation, output coding, secure authentication, and authorization.
5. Assess the team’s training and knowledge: Assess the team’s training and knowledge in secure coding practices. Check if they have received any training on secure coding practices and if they are aware of the latest security threats and vulnerabilities.
By performing these steps, you can determine if the application development project team is using secure coding practices and identify any areas for improvement
1. Consult the project document to see whether there are relevant safety requirements and safety coding standards. Having detailed secure coding specifications usually means that the project team values secure coding practices.
2. Check the source code of the project to see if it complies with the security coding specification. For example, whether the user input is strictly verified, whether the security function is used, and whether the minimum permission principle is followed. If the source code values these security measures, secure coding practices may be used.
3. Check the vulnerability scanning and repair process of the project. If the source code security scan is done regularly to fix security risks in the scan results, the team is likely to focus on secure coding practices.
4. Talk to project team members and ask them how they consider and handle security during the development process. If team members can clearly explain secure design concepts and specific secure coding measures, then the team is likely to adopt secure coding practices.
5. Check the security incidents that project products encounter when they are made public. If the project product rarely appears security vulnerabilities, and the vulnerabilities can be fixed in time after discovery, it indicates that the project team is likely to have strong security awareness and security coding ability.
6. View the third-party safety evaluation report of the project products. Many security research organizations and communities evaluate major software products, and if the product receives a high security score, the project team may have adopted better secure coding practices.
1. Review the project documentation: Review the project documentation, including the requirements, design documents, and coding standards to ensure that they include security considerations and best practices.
2. Conduct code reviews: Conduct code reviews to identify any security vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the code. Look for common security issues such as input validation, output encoding, error handling, authentication and authorization mechanisms, encryption of sensitive data in transit and at rest.
3. Perform automated testing: Use automated testing tools to scan the code for known vulnerabilities and weaknesses. This can help identify potential security issues that may have been missed during manual code reviews.
4. Check for compliance with industry standards: Check if the development team is following industry standards such as OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) or NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines for secure coding practices.
I will refer to SDL practices according to the process:
1. Concept and planning
The purpose of this stage is to define the application concept and evaluate its viability. Includes developing a project plan, writing project requirements, and allocating human resources.
2. Architecture and design
The purpose of this stage is to design a product that meets the requirements. Includes modeling the application structure and its usage scenarios and choosing third-party components that can speed up development. The result of this stage is a design document.
3.Implementation
This is the stage at which an application is created. Includes writing the application code, debugging it, and producing stable builds suitable for testing.
4. Testing and bug fixing
The purpose of this stage is to discover and correct application errors. Includes running automatic and manual tests, identifying issues, and fixing them.
5. Release and maintenance
At this stage, an application goes live, with many instances running in a variety of environments. Eventually, new versions and patches become available, and some customers choose to upgrade, while others decide to keep the older versions.
6. End of life
“End of life” is the point when its developer no longer supports the software. Applications that store sensitive data may be subject to specific end-of-life regulations.
Be sure to conduct code reviews to assess whether the team is following secure coding practices and to identify potential vulnerabilities. Validation and testing are also used to determine whether the application development project team is using secure coding practices.
1. Review the code to see if they used security coding practices.
2. Testing the code to see if the security coding works.
3. Identify all the potential vulnerabilities.
4. Evaluate the code to see if coding meets with standards and requirements related to security.
5. Evaluate and communicate with the team based on security aspects.
(1)Code Reviews: Conduct thorough code reviews of the application’s source code.
(2)Security Testing: Perform security testing, including penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, to identify potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the application.
(3)Secure Coding Guidelines: Review the team’s adherence to established secure coding guidelines or standards, such as OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) Top 10 or CERT Secure Coding Standards.
(4)Documentation and Secure Development Lifecycle (SDL): Review the team’s documentation and processes related to secure development.
(5)In addition, External Audits and Certifications, Bug Bounty Programs and etc.
It is possible to determine whether the application development team is using secure coding practices through a review of secure coding. Security programming review is an important task aimed at ensuring the security and reliability of software and avoiding potential vulnerabilities and attacks.
1. Determine the review standards and requirements, based on the functionality and characteristics of the software, determine the standards and requirements required for the review, such as language specifications, coding specifications, security, readability, etc.
2. Collect source code. This includes the code for each version and branch of the software.
3. Automatically and manually identify the source code of the detection project, identify whether the project source code meets relevant standards and requirements, and identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the code.
4. Review the audit report and conduct audit tracking.
To determine if an application development project team is using secure coding practices, you can perform the following actions:
Review the project documentation: Check if the project documentation includes security requirements, design specifications, and development guidelines that promote secure coding practices.
Conduct interviews with the development team: Ask the development team about their knowledge of secure coding practices, their use of secure coding tools, and their experience with secure development methodologies.
Review the coding standards and guidelines: Check if the development team is using secure coding standards and guidelines, such as OWASP Top 10, SANS Top 25, or CERT Secure Coding Standards.
Conduct a code review: Review the code for common vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and buffer overflows, and verify if the development team has implemented secure coding practices to mitigate these risks.
Check for secure development tools: Check if the development team is using secure development tools, such as static code analysis tools, dynamic application security testing (DAST) tools, and vulnerability scanners, to identify and mitigate coding vulnerabilities.
Verify the testing practices: Check if the development team is conducting security testing, such as penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, and security code review, to identify and mitigate security risks.
By performing these actions, you can determine if an application development project team is using secure coding practices and identify areas for improvement.
In order to achieve security, it is very important to determine a “secure coding standard” for the program at the beginning of the application development to help the team deal with the security defaults of the software and help protect it from attack attacks.
You must ensure that adherence to this standard is enforced across your entire team, regardless of the coding languages and tools they use in their programs.
Here are a few examples of default implementations that are required in secure code design:
Access should be limited to authenticated users and authentication needs to be enforced at each layer.
The communication channel needs to be encrypted to protect the authentication token.
All keys, passwords, and certificates need to be stored and protected properly.
File encryption, database encryption, and data element encryption need to be implemented.
1. Check their processes during the testing phase. Project teams should check their applications for the most common vulnerabilities outlined by SANS, such as SQL injection, buffer overflows, format strings, and so on. If the team is not checking for these vulnerabilities, then it is likely not considering that this is during the planning and development phase of the application.
2. Use code review and peer review.
1. I would ask them directly whether they use the secure coding practices. This is the easiest way to know the answer.
2. I can also examine the team’s written code. If the code is well-structured and adheres to recommended practices, which means that the team is utilizing secure coding methods.
3. The team’s methods and tools for managing code security can also be examined. The team is probably following secure coding techniques if it makes use of a secure code repository and has a reliable mechanism for handling code changes.
Conduct secure code review
A secure code review is the process of identifying and remediating potential vulnerabilities in your code. This can be done manually, using automated tools, or a combination.
1. As part of the development process, organisations should thoroughly test software before it is distributed internally (or released to the market).
(1) White-box testing white-box testing examines the internal logic of a program and executes the code line by line, thus analysing the program for potential errors.
(2) Black box testing examines the program from the user’s perspective by providing a wide range of input scenarios and looking at the output. The black box tester does not access the internal code. A common example of black box testing is the final acceptance test performed before the system is submitted.
(3) Grey Box Testing Grey box testing is a combination of the two above-mentioned testing methods and is a popular method of software verification. In this type of testing, the tester sets out to handle the software from the user’s point of view, analysing the inputs and outputs. The testers also access the source code and use it to help design the tests. However, the testers do not analyse the inner workings of the program during testing.
2. In addition to assessing the quality of the software, programmers and security professionals should carefully evaluate the security of the software to ensure that it meets the organisation’s security requirements. This is particularly critical for Web applications that are exposed to the public. There are two types of tests that are specifically designed to assess the security of an application:
(1) Static testingStatic testing assesses the security of software by analysing the source code or compiled application, but static analysis usually involves the use of automated tools to detect common software defects such as buffer overflows (in mature development environments, application developers have access to static analysis tools and use them throughout the design/build/test process).
(2) Dynamic testing Dynamic testing assesses the security of software in a runtime (runtime) environment.
1. Security left shift: In most cases, security detection is limited to a few weeks before the product goes online for centralized product security testing. Under the demand of high release, Safety engineer simply cannot complete such a huge amount of tasks, so more attention should be paid to the “left” side of the R&D process, and security intervention and control should also be carried out in earlier links (design, coding, automatic testing).
2. Default security: In the absence of a qualitative change in personnel security capabilities in a short period of time, providing a default security development framework or default security components may effectively prevent low-level errors, such as the anti csrf token security mechanism built into the framework. In an application based on the CodeIgniter framework and with this configuration enabled, it may be difficult to find CSRF vulnerabilities. The principle of default security is not limited to code. The default coverage of WAF on the web access layer, basic systems and services such as cloud/container/database/cache with default security configuration, unified login authentication service, KMS (Key Management System), ticket system for protecting critical data, Zero Trust architecture, and so on are all good practices of default security.
3. Runtime security: With the increasing speed of release, in addition to left shift and default security, security considerations also require special attention and strengthening of anomaly monitoring and attack blocking capabilities during runtime after launch. There is a need for more timely and automated risk monitoring, discovery, blocking, recovery, and other means and mechanisms. Security mechanisms also require mechanisms and capabilities to enhance system availability, with a focus on identifying internal and external security risks.
To determine whether an application development project team is using secure coding practices, the company should first conduct a code review to assess whether the team is following secure coding practices and whether there are vulnerabilities and malicious code and software. Second, review the application’s security scorecard and PT, SAST, and DAST reports to identify vulnerabilities. Then there is the development environment, the deployment environment, and the application environment. Also check that teams and projects are compliant and follow industry standards.
I will refer to NIST Special Publication 800-218 and assess whether the team has followed the recommendations outlined in the document. For audits, I would review the policies mentioned above and then assess whether the team is following them.First, a thorough code review is required to assess whether the team is following secure coding practices and, at the same time, to identify potential vulnerabilities, insecure coding patterns. It is also important to assess whether the security team is professional and compliant, and whether their cooperation and communication is smooth and effective.
Chenhao Zhang says
If the application security coding principles meet the following, it should be possible to determine that the application development team uses security coding practices:
1、The application should know what is coming in.
2、The application should be structured and written with good flow and
controls.
3、The application should only call the trusted resources.
4、The application should limit access to the data only as needed for the
program logic and processing.
5、The application should guard what is being sent out.
Yujie Cao says
I believe the following methods can be considered to determine if the application development project team is using secure coding practices:
1. Contact and interview the application development team, which includes process knowledge, application functional knowledge, known secure code practices and vulnerabilities, etc.
Review application security scorecards and PT, SAST, and DAST reports
3. Review change management procedures
4. Understand the application development environment in which the application is developed and deployed and identify the security risks associated with it.
Chun Liu says
I will refer to NIST Special Publication 800-218 and assess whether the team has followed the recommendations outlined in the document. For audits, I would review the policies mentioned above and then assess whether the team is following them. For example, if the company uses a code analysis tool to review code, I would look for reports from that tool that correspond to when developers push code. If the organization does not have an automated analysis tool, I would look at code review sessions and find documentation of when past sessions occurred, such as reviewer comments on pull requests.
According to the SANS Application Development Techniques and Tools white paper, code review and peer review can help uncover errors that lead to input validation. The paper cites the following examples that can be identified during a review. “If URLs are used as data types, it is also important to validate the existence of such URLs. Failure to validate input can expose applications to cross-site scripting and similar attacks.
Shuting Zhang says
To determine if an application development project team is using secure coding practices, company should conduct a thorough code review to assess if the team is following secure coding practices. Identify any potential vulnerabilities or insecure coding patterns. What’s more, they also should perform security testing, such as penetration testing or vulnerability scanning, to assess the robustness of the application against common security weaknesses. And evaluate if the team follows industry best practices, coding standards, and compliance requirements related to security. And during these points, the team’s collaboration and communication regarding security aspects also should be evaluate.
Yawen Du says
First, a thorough code review is required to assess whether the team is following secure coding practices and, at the same time, to identify potential vulnerabilities, insecure coding patterns. It is also important to assess whether the security team is professional and compliant, and whether their cooperation and communication is smooth and effective.
Yuanjun Xie says
The following methods can be used to determine whether an application development project team is using secure coding practices:
1. Review the usage code of the project team to check whether security coding practices are used and whether there are loopholes and malicious code;
2. Review the application security scorecard and PT, SAST and DAST reports;
3. Understand the development environment, deployment environment and application environment;
4. Check whether the project and the team are operating in compliance.
Zhang Yunpeng says
If I were checking if an applications development project team was using secure coding practices, I would first examine their process during the testing phase. The project team should be running checks against their application for the most common vulnerabilities as outlined by SANS, such as SQL injections, buffer overflows, format strings etc. If the team isn’t checking for these vulnerabilities, then the most likely were not considering this during the planning and development phases of the application. The secure coding practices need to be followed while the code for the application is in development.
Chunqi Liu says
I review the strategies mentioned above and then evaluate whether the team followed them. For example, if a company uses a code analysis tool to review code, I look for reports from that tool that correspond to when developers push code. If the organization does not have automated analysis tools, I look at code review meetings and find documents from past meetings, such as reviewer comments on pull requests.
According to the SANS Application Development Techniques and Tools Whitepapers, code reviews and peer reviews can help catch errors that cause input validation. This article cites the following examples that can be identified during the review process. It is also important to verify the existence of urls if they are used as data types. Failure to validate inputs exposes the application to cross-site scripting and similar attacks.
Hao Zhang says
One of the ways to determine if an applications development project team was using secure coding practices, is testing by validation and verification as this will provide an objective and independent view of the secure coding.
Another way is by logging and auditing to give reasonable assurance.
Shuyi Dong says
To determine if an application development project team is using secure coding practices, we can perform the following steps:
1. Review the project documentation. Check that the project documentation includes security requirements, design specifications, and coding standards. These documents should outline the security measures that the team plans to implement throughout the development process. 2. 2.
2. Conduct a code review: Review the code written by the development team to ensure it complies with coding standards and best practices, looking for common security vulnerabilities.
3. Conduct vulnerability testing: Conduct vulnerability testing of the application to identify any security weaknesses.
4. Check for secure coding techniques: Check that the development team is using secure coding techniques such as input validation, output coding, secure authentication, and authorization.
5. Assess the team’s training and knowledge: Assess the team’s training and knowledge in secure coding practices. Check if they have received any training on secure coding practices and if they are aware of the latest security threats and vulnerabilities.
By performing these steps, you can determine if the application development project team is using secure coding practices and identify any areas for improvement
Guanhua Xiao says
1. Consult the project document to see whether there are relevant safety requirements and safety coding standards. Having detailed secure coding specifications usually means that the project team values secure coding practices.
2. Check the source code of the project to see if it complies with the security coding specification. For example, whether the user input is strictly verified, whether the security function is used, and whether the minimum permission principle is followed. If the source code values these security measures, secure coding practices may be used.
3. Check the vulnerability scanning and repair process of the project. If the source code security scan is done regularly to fix security risks in the scan results, the team is likely to focus on secure coding practices.
4. Talk to project team members and ask them how they consider and handle security during the development process. If team members can clearly explain secure design concepts and specific secure coding measures, then the team is likely to adopt secure coding practices.
5. Check the security incidents that project products encounter when they are made public. If the project product rarely appears security vulnerabilities, and the vulnerabilities can be fixed in time after discovery, it indicates that the project team is likely to have strong security awareness and security coding ability.
6. View the third-party safety evaluation report of the project products. Many security research organizations and communities evaluate major software products, and if the product receives a high security score, the project team may have adopted better secure coding practices.
Hongli Ma says
1. Review the project documentation: Review the project documentation, including the requirements, design documents, and coding standards to ensure that they include security considerations and best practices.
2. Conduct code reviews: Conduct code reviews to identify any security vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the code. Look for common security issues such as input validation, output encoding, error handling, authentication and authorization mechanisms, encryption of sensitive data in transit and at rest.
3. Perform automated testing: Use automated testing tools to scan the code for known vulnerabilities and weaknesses. This can help identify potential security issues that may have been missed during manual code reviews.
4. Check for compliance with industry standards: Check if the development team is following industry standards such as OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) or NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines for secure coding practices.
Shijie Yang says
I will refer to SDL practices according to the process:
1. Concept and planning
The purpose of this stage is to define the application concept and evaluate its viability. Includes developing a project plan, writing project requirements, and allocating human resources.
2. Architecture and design
The purpose of this stage is to design a product that meets the requirements. Includes modeling the application structure and its usage scenarios and choosing third-party components that can speed up development. The result of this stage is a design document.
3.Implementation
This is the stage at which an application is created. Includes writing the application code, debugging it, and producing stable builds suitable for testing.
4. Testing and bug fixing
The purpose of this stage is to discover and correct application errors. Includes running automatic and manual tests, identifying issues, and fixing them.
5. Release and maintenance
At this stage, an application goes live, with many instances running in a variety of environments. Eventually, new versions and patches become available, and some customers choose to upgrade, while others decide to keep the older versions.
6. End of life
“End of life” is the point when its developer no longer supports the software. Applications that store sensitive data may be subject to specific end-of-life regulations.
Nana Li says
Be sure to conduct code reviews to assess whether the team is following secure coding practices and to identify potential vulnerabilities. Validation and testing are also used to determine whether the application development project team is using secure coding practices.
Haoran Wang says
1. Review the code to see if they used security coding practices.
2. Testing the code to see if the security coding works.
3. Identify all the potential vulnerabilities.
4. Evaluate the code to see if coding meets with standards and requirements related to security.
5. Evaluate and communicate with the team based on security aspects.
Yi Liu says
(1)Code Reviews: Conduct thorough code reviews of the application’s source code.
(2)Security Testing: Perform security testing, including penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, to identify potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the application.
(3)Secure Coding Guidelines: Review the team’s adherence to established secure coding guidelines or standards, such as OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) Top 10 or CERT Secure Coding Standards.
(4)Documentation and Secure Development Lifecycle (SDL): Review the team’s documentation and processes related to secure development.
(5)In addition, External Audits and Certifications, Bug Bounty Programs and etc.
Haixu Yao says
It is possible to determine whether the application development team is using secure coding practices through a review of secure coding. Security programming review is an important task aimed at ensuring the security and reliability of software and avoiding potential vulnerabilities and attacks.
1. Determine the review standards and requirements, based on the functionality and characteristics of the software, determine the standards and requirements required for the review, such as language specifications, coding specifications, security, readability, etc.
2. Collect source code. This includes the code for each version and branch of the software.
3. Automatically and manually identify the source code of the detection project, identify whether the project source code meets relevant standards and requirements, and identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the code.
4. Review the audit report and conduct audit tracking.
Xinyi Peng says
To determine if an application development project team is using secure coding practices, you can perform the following actions:
Review the project documentation: Check if the project documentation includes security requirements, design specifications, and development guidelines that promote secure coding practices.
Conduct interviews with the development team: Ask the development team about their knowledge of secure coding practices, their use of secure coding tools, and their experience with secure development methodologies.
Review the coding standards and guidelines: Check if the development team is using secure coding standards and guidelines, such as OWASP Top 10, SANS Top 25, or CERT Secure Coding Standards.
Conduct a code review: Review the code for common vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and buffer overflows, and verify if the development team has implemented secure coding practices to mitigate these risks.
Check for secure development tools: Check if the development team is using secure development tools, such as static code analysis tools, dynamic application security testing (DAST) tools, and vulnerability scanners, to identify and mitigate coding vulnerabilities.
Verify the testing practices: Check if the development team is conducting security testing, such as penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, and security code review, to identify and mitigate security risks.
By performing these actions, you can determine if an application development project team is using secure coding practices and identify areas for improvement.
Xiaozhi Shi says
In order to achieve security, it is very important to determine a “secure coding standard” for the program at the beginning of the application development to help the team deal with the security defaults of the software and help protect it from attack attacks.
You must ensure that adherence to this standard is enforced across your entire team, regardless of the coding languages and tools they use in their programs.
Here are a few examples of default implementations that are required in secure code design:
Access should be limited to authenticated users and authentication needs to be enforced at each layer.
The communication channel needs to be encrypted to protect the authentication token.
All keys, passwords, and certificates need to be stored and protected properly.
File encryption, database encryption, and data element encryption need to be implemented.
Hao Li says
1. Check their processes during the testing phase. Project teams should check their applications for the most common vulnerabilities outlined by SANS, such as SQL injection, buffer overflows, format strings, and so on. If the team is not checking for these vulnerabilities, then it is likely not considering that this is during the planning and development phase of the application.
2. Use code review and peer review.
Yue Ma says
1. I would ask them directly whether they use the secure coding practices. This is the easiest way to know the answer.
2. I can also examine the team’s written code. If the code is well-structured and adheres to recommended practices, which means that the team is utilizing secure coding methods.
3. The team’s methods and tools for managing code security can also be examined. The team is probably following secure coding techniques if it makes use of a secure code repository and has a reliable mechanism for handling code changes.
Yuming He says
Conduct secure code review
A secure code review is the process of identifying and remediating potential vulnerabilities in your code. This can be done manually, using automated tools, or a combination.
Yue Wang says
1. As part of the development process, organisations should thoroughly test software before it is distributed internally (or released to the market).
(1) White-box testing white-box testing examines the internal logic of a program and executes the code line by line, thus analysing the program for potential errors.
(2) Black box testing examines the program from the user’s perspective by providing a wide range of input scenarios and looking at the output. The black box tester does not access the internal code. A common example of black box testing is the final acceptance test performed before the system is submitted.
(3) Grey Box Testing Grey box testing is a combination of the two above-mentioned testing methods and is a popular method of software verification. In this type of testing, the tester sets out to handle the software from the user’s point of view, analysing the inputs and outputs. The testers also access the source code and use it to help design the tests. However, the testers do not analyse the inner workings of the program during testing.
2. In addition to assessing the quality of the software, programmers and security professionals should carefully evaluate the security of the software to ensure that it meets the organisation’s security requirements. This is particularly critical for Web applications that are exposed to the public. There are two types of tests that are specifically designed to assess the security of an application:
(1) Static testingStatic testing assesses the security of software by analysing the source code or compiled application, but static analysis usually involves the use of automated tools to detect common software defects such as buffer overflows (in mature development environments, application developers have access to static analysis tools and use them throughout the design/build/test process).
(2) Dynamic testing Dynamic testing assesses the security of software in a runtime (runtime) environment.
Zhaomeng Wang says
1. Security left shift: In most cases, security detection is limited to a few weeks before the product goes online for centralized product security testing. Under the demand of high release, Safety engineer simply cannot complete such a huge amount of tasks, so more attention should be paid to the “left” side of the R&D process, and security intervention and control should also be carried out in earlier links (design, coding, automatic testing).
2. Default security: In the absence of a qualitative change in personnel security capabilities in a short period of time, providing a default security development framework or default security components may effectively prevent low-level errors, such as the anti csrf token security mechanism built into the framework. In an application based on the CodeIgniter framework and with this configuration enabled, it may be difficult to find CSRF vulnerabilities. The principle of default security is not limited to code. The default coverage of WAF on the web access layer, basic systems and services such as cloud/container/database/cache with default security configuration, unified login authentication service, KMS (Key Management System), ticket system for protecting critical data, Zero Trust architecture, and so on are all good practices of default security.
3. Runtime security: With the increasing speed of release, in addition to left shift and default security, security considerations also require special attention and strengthening of anomaly monitoring and attack blocking capabilities during runtime after launch. There is a need for more timely and automated risk monitoring, discovery, blocking, recovery, and other means and mechanisms. Security mechanisms also require mechanisms and capabilities to enhance system availability, with a focus on identifying internal and external security risks.
Yiwei Hu says
To determine whether an application development project team is using secure coding practices, the company should first conduct a code review to assess whether the team is following secure coding practices and whether there are vulnerabilities and malicious code and software. Second, review the application’s security scorecard and PT, SAST, and DAST reports to identify vulnerabilities. Then there is the development environment, the deployment environment, and the application environment. Also check that teams and projects are compliant and follow industry standards.
Xuanwen Zheng says
I will refer to NIST Special Publication 800-218 and assess whether the team has followed the recommendations outlined in the document. For audits, I would review the policies mentioned above and then assess whether the team is following them.First, a thorough code review is required to assess whether the team is following secure coding practices and, at the same time, to identify potential vulnerabilities, insecure coding patterns. It is also important to assess whether the security team is professional and compliant, and whether their cooperation and communication is smooth and effective.