• Log In
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • HomePage
  • Instructor
  • Syllabus
  • Schedule
    • First Half of the Semester
      • Week 1: Course Introduction
      • Week 2: Meterpreter, Avoiding Detection, Client Side Attacks, and Auxiliary Modules
      • Week 3: Social Engineering Toolkit, SQL Injection, Karmetasploit, Building Modules in Metasploit, and Creating Exploits
      • Week 4: Porting Exploits, Scripting, and Simulating Penetration Testing
      • Week 5: Independent Study – Perform Metasploit Attack and Create Presentation
      • Week 6: Ettercap
      • Week 7: Introduction to OWASP’s WebGoat application
    • Second Half of the Semester
      • Week 8: Independent Study
      • Week 9: Introduction to Wireless Security
      • Week 10: Wireless Recon, WEP, and WPA2
      • Week 11: WPA2 Enterprise, Wireless beyond WiFi
      • Week 12: Jack the Ripper, Cain and Able, Delivery of Sample Operating Systems
      • Week 13: Independent Study – Analyze provided Operating System Samples and Create Assessment Report
      • Week 14: Deliver Assessment to Operating System Class either in person or via teleconferenc
  • Assignments
    • Analysis Reports
    • Group Project Report and Presentation
  • Webex
  • Harvard Coursepack
  • Gradebook

MIS 5212-Advanced Penetration Testing

MIS 5212 - Section 001 - Wade Mackey

Fox School of Business

Is counter-attack justified against a state-sponsored cyber attack? It’s a legal grey area

March 21, 2018 by Donald Hoxhaj Leave a Comment

https://theconversation.com/is-counter-attack-justified-against-a-state-sponsored-cyber-attack-its-a-legal-grey-area-94023

US Department of Justice indicted 9 Iranians against cyber-attacks on many public and private institutions, on March 23. Institutions were targeted worldwide; even United Nations was not spared. This movement will not reduce the number of cyber-attacks in future. International law does not provide provision for self-defense against cyber-attack (only army attack is identified). So it needs to be analyzed if this action by the US is appropriate and real. This is the grey area which international community should consider upon.

Defendants are founders of an organization formed for the purpose of scientific espionage. The organization is named as Mabna which reportedly got the contract from Iran to conduct cyberattack on its behalf. Lots of data were stolen by this organization. It wanted to steal research data and intellectual property information. More than 1 lakh professors and 8000 emails were targeted. Private companies were targeted too using password spraying technique in which hacker gains access to the email account by using default or common passwords. Some say that this action is not going to cause much deterrence. According to them, there should be counter attack as in this case culprits will not be given punishment as they are based in Iran.

Filed Under: Week 05 Tagged With:

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Weekly Discussions

  • Uncategorized (10)
  • Week 01 (18)
  • Week 02 (9)
  • Week 03 (13)
  • Week 04 (17)
  • Week 05 (12)
  • Week 06 (16)
  • Week 07 (2)
  • Week 08 (8)
  • Week 09 (5)
  • Week 10 (10)
  • Week 11 (5)
  • Week 12 (5)
  • Week 13 (2)
  • Week 14 (7)

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in