ITACS students represent security vulnerabilities to Temple University as well as each other. ITACS students have access to certain IT infrastructures at Temple and without proper protection and possible human error this can lead to unauthorized access as well as data breaches. Furthermore, ITACS students that use Temples campus networks provide opportunities to introduce malware and other threats. Students engaging in risky online behavior can lead to malware attacks and threats to Temples systems. ITACS students may also share sensitive information via their Temple emails that can lead to security breaches and create more vulnerability to Temples data bases and systems. Lastly, in a lab setting, without the correct controls and proper procedures, students may accidently harm each other’s systems.
ITACS students represent a security vulnerability to both the University and to each other.
To Temple:
The informaton stored on the assets owned by the insitution is at risk when being accessed by students who may not be security conscious or well trained on information security. The students are allowed the capability of using their own devices to access the insititution’s information and resources whenever and wherever they decide. In the modern world, information managed, owned and collected by an institution (such as Temple) is often more valuable than the real estate and the physical resources the entity controls. The “Trade Secrets” which are intangible value include the internal knowledge that is not publicly available which are used to gain business inteligence and allow the University to pioneer and maintain its position as one of the top universities in the state. If the university’s information systems are compromised due to a student’s negligence (often due to insufficient training/incomplete understanding of how a computer works), trade secrets, student/faculty personal information may be exposed and exploited to cause greater damage. This exposes the insitution to legal fees/fines, a tarnished reputation, loss of business, and a potential rate hike on insurance premiums.
In the event trade secrets are leaked, Temple may not be able to seek damages in a court if the university did not implement “reasonable effort” to secure/harden and monitor the security controls governing its Information Assets and their effectiveness.
To Students:
ITACS students present a security vulnerability to themselves when sharing information with each other, As humans who interact with the systems owned by the university, they are more susceptible to social engineering attacks if they are not well trained or security conscious. Temple owns and manages information assets that hold personal and confidential information pertaining to students and staff of the instituition. The information may include, date of births, addresses, social security numbers, and bank account information. Threat actors may exploit the vulnerability of students to gain access to the university’s internal systems and information which puts other students at the risk of their personal information being leaked. The impact realized by students may be to their credit and bank accounts, or even to their places of employment and loved ones.
It is important to note that in addition to Temple’s security measures, controls, and mechanisms, it is just as important to provide continous and dynamic training to students and staff.
ITACS students can represent information security vulnerabilities to both Temple University and each other. Human behavior and negligence are among the most common threats to data security. For example, students might inadvertently open an email containing a malware attachment or click on a phishing link, potentially compromising their device and Temple University’s entire network. This poses a significant risk to the institution, as a breach could expose financial records, and to students, whose personal information is collected by the school.
ITACS students have the potential to pose security risks to both Temple University and their fellow students. Given their access to university systems, academic records and networks there is a possibility that students may expose these assets to security risks either intentionally or unintentionally.
The lack of awareness of security protocols or inadequate training in practices can escalate this risk. Likewise, students might expose each other to vulnerabilities through communication channels, shared devices or collaboration tools that lack security measures. Therefore, it is crucial for students to be diligent in adhering to security guidelines in order to mitigate these risks.
ITACS students can represent information security vulnerabilities to both the university and each other. Human carelessness remains the most common source of loss today. While using their Temple email, students may fall victim to phishing emails, which can compromise the university, as well as their own personal data. Additionally, humans tend to view information security as an annoyance and ignore password suggestions. Students may create weak passwords, or use the same password for multiple things, making it easier for attackers to gain unauthorized access to university systems. By compromising the university systems, all student data could potentially be exposed, such as financial information and social security numbers.
A student’s carelessness can result in vulnerabilities. If one chooses to sign up for a site that leaks their data to other parties with their tux12345@temple.edu email, it can comprise the university data. Students can also create passwords that are easier to hack into. This is another example of a security vulnerability.
Students could try to hack into one another peers’ account using their TU credentials. This access to another student’s profile can cause sensitive information to leak. Group projects could also lead to vulnerabilities. If one group member does not secure their data or technology like their laptop, it could expose the group’s ideas and work.
ITACS students represent information security vulnerabilities to Temple University as well as each other. Human failure one of the primary reasons for loss through negligence such as mishandling credentials, phishing, and sharing passwords. Students have a wide variety of access to university systems that contain personal information that could be exposed.
On the other hand, Temple university is a large organization that holds a wealth of personal information that would valuable information for a scammer/hacker given the opportunity. Temple University must ensure they have the best policies, and procedures to combat security risks.
Yes, ITACS students can pose information security risks to Temple University and to one another. Much like employees can be a risk to their companies, human errors such as creating weak passwords or falling for phishing schemes can lead to significant security breaches. Even without malicious intent, individuals can inadvertently expose confidential data, potentially leading to catastrophic outcomes. Additionally, the skills acquired in the ITACS program, such as penetration testing, could also present a risk to the school if misused. Hiring ethical hackers, who possess the same curiosity and mindset as malicious hackers, allows organizations to proactively identify vulnerabilities through penetration testing before a real cyberattack occurs. However, if these skills are taught to someone with malicious intent, they could pose a serious threat to the school’s security.
ITACS students represent information security vulnerabilities to Temple University and each other. These security vulnerabilities can be intentional but, in many cases, unintentional. For example, as we learned in Unit 1, one of the challenges facing information security is the general attitude about security. In my experience, I have noticed a lack of cautiousness around potential security breaches. It is not serious to individuals, until it happens to them. When I was in undergrad, I experienced many emails that appeared to be phishing emails. I did not open, but I know that some people may have opened and exposed Temple University to a security attack. Additionally, we read that BYOD (bring your own device) causes institutions and individuals to be open to security breaches. It is harder to manage risk when students are using personal devices. Simply, utilizing public Wi-Fi while accessing Temple sites can be a possible vulnerability. As the author notes, all it takes is a laptop and internet connection to hack
ITACS students at Temple University represent potential security vulnerabilities to both the university and each other, primarily because any device that connects to the internet can be a target for cyberattacks. This includes the various mobile phones, laptops, tablets, and other devices that students regularly connect to campus networks. For example, if an ITACS student connects a personal device to the campus network without proper security measures, such as strong passwords, updated operating systems, or installation of antivirus protection, that device could become vulnerable and may be compromised by an attacker, posing a significant risk to both the student and the university’s network.
A lack of awareness or training among ITACS students can prevent them from recognizing common cyber threats, such as phishing emails, malicious websites, or social engineering tactics. For instance, a student unfamiliar with phishing tactics might unknowingly click on a malicious link in an email, which could allow an attacker to gain access to their personal credentials or even the university’s systems.
ITACS Students represent vulnerabilities to both each other and Temple. To keep this short we all represent vulnerabilities to one another now that we have been given a level of trust and access. Now that we have been given access to the class and the campus we possess higher levels of privilege then a normal person would, and any level of permission given above the norm represents a risk. This is the obvious answer.
What I would like to argue instead is that all humans represent a security risk by the existence of our cooperative nature. This can be seen in the prevalence and success of phishing and spear phishing attempts in the wild. It is human nature to want to trust another to some extent and by that logic every person, every relationship that is given a small amount of trust is a risk that can possibly exploited in a social engineering attempt. I have worked in security for the last 6 years and even though I know that it is not something that should be done I still find myself holding secure doors open for those with full arm loads by default. To me, as I would argue as it is to most people, being see as rude in the now is a much larger and more realistic consequence then the potential of causing a security breach.
ITACS students represent information security vulnerabilities to temple university, vulnerability is a weakness in a network that can be exploited by bad actors, temple university students connect to the school network via phones, laptops and tablets to access the school data for their day-to-day school programs, therefore, bad actors can target the students in so many ways to exploit the vulnerability. Cyber criminals can send phishing email to the students disguising to be a reputable institution or from a higher authority requesting sensitive information, a successful phishing attempt will lead to unauthorized access to systems containing students record. Bad actors can also use this information to perpetuate ransomware where they ask the students to pay money or else they make the information public. Bad students with malicious intent can hack into the school critical information for their selfish interest. The insider knowledge of students is a threat to the school data.
The vulnerability posses by temple university students are the reason why there are strict controls for students accessing the school data from their devices, example of these controls are, the account lock, the muti factor authentication, security awareness training for students etc.
ITACS students represent security vulnerabilities to Temple University as well as each other. ITACS students have access to certain IT infrastructures at Temple and without proper protection and possible human error this can lead to unauthorized access as well as data breaches. Furthermore, ITACS students that use Temples campus networks provide opportunities to introduce malware and other threats. Students engaging in risky online behavior can lead to malware attacks and threats to Temples systems. ITACS students may also share sensitive information via their Temple emails that can lead to security breaches and create more vulnerability to Temples data bases and systems. Lastly, in a lab setting, without the correct controls and proper procedures, students may accidently harm each other’s systems.
ITACS students represent a security vulnerability to both the University and to each other.
To Temple:
The informaton stored on the assets owned by the insitution is at risk when being accessed by students who may not be security conscious or well trained on information security. The students are allowed the capability of using their own devices to access the insititution’s information and resources whenever and wherever they decide. In the modern world, information managed, owned and collected by an institution (such as Temple) is often more valuable than the real estate and the physical resources the entity controls. The “Trade Secrets” which are intangible value include the internal knowledge that is not publicly available which are used to gain business inteligence and allow the University to pioneer and maintain its position as one of the top universities in the state. If the university’s information systems are compromised due to a student’s negligence (often due to insufficient training/incomplete understanding of how a computer works), trade secrets, student/faculty personal information may be exposed and exploited to cause greater damage. This exposes the insitution to legal fees/fines, a tarnished reputation, loss of business, and a potential rate hike on insurance premiums.
In the event trade secrets are leaked, Temple may not be able to seek damages in a court if the university did not implement “reasonable effort” to secure/harden and monitor the security controls governing its Information Assets and their effectiveness.
To Students:
ITACS students present a security vulnerability to themselves when sharing information with each other, As humans who interact with the systems owned by the university, they are more susceptible to social engineering attacks if they are not well trained or security conscious. Temple owns and manages information assets that hold personal and confidential information pertaining to students and staff of the instituition. The information may include, date of births, addresses, social security numbers, and bank account information. Threat actors may exploit the vulnerability of students to gain access to the university’s internal systems and information which puts other students at the risk of their personal information being leaked. The impact realized by students may be to their credit and bank accounts, or even to their places of employment and loved ones.
It is important to note that in addition to Temple’s security measures, controls, and mechanisms, it is just as important to provide continous and dynamic training to students and staff.
ITACS students can represent information security vulnerabilities to both Temple University and each other. Human behavior and negligence are among the most common threats to data security. For example, students might inadvertently open an email containing a malware attachment or click on a phishing link, potentially compromising their device and Temple University’s entire network. This poses a significant risk to the institution, as a breach could expose financial records, and to students, whose personal information is collected by the school.
ITACS students have the potential to pose security risks to both Temple University and their fellow students. Given their access to university systems, academic records and networks there is a possibility that students may expose these assets to security risks either intentionally or unintentionally.
The lack of awareness of security protocols or inadequate training in practices can escalate this risk. Likewise, students might expose each other to vulnerabilities through communication channels, shared devices or collaboration tools that lack security measures. Therefore, it is crucial for students to be diligent in adhering to security guidelines in order to mitigate these risks.
ITACS students can represent information security vulnerabilities to both the university and each other. Human carelessness remains the most common source of loss today. While using their Temple email, students may fall victim to phishing emails, which can compromise the university, as well as their own personal data. Additionally, humans tend to view information security as an annoyance and ignore password suggestions. Students may create weak passwords, or use the same password for multiple things, making it easier for attackers to gain unauthorized access to university systems. By compromising the university systems, all student data could potentially be exposed, such as financial information and social security numbers.
A student’s carelessness can result in vulnerabilities. If one chooses to sign up for a site that leaks their data to other parties with their tux12345@temple.edu email, it can comprise the university data. Students can also create passwords that are easier to hack into. This is another example of a security vulnerability.
Students could try to hack into one another peers’ account using their TU credentials. This access to another student’s profile can cause sensitive information to leak. Group projects could also lead to vulnerabilities. If one group member does not secure their data or technology like their laptop, it could expose the group’s ideas and work.
ITACS students represent information security vulnerabilities to Temple University as well as each other. Human failure one of the primary reasons for loss through negligence such as mishandling credentials, phishing, and sharing passwords. Students have a wide variety of access to university systems that contain personal information that could be exposed.
On the other hand, Temple university is a large organization that holds a wealth of personal information that would valuable information for a scammer/hacker given the opportunity. Temple University must ensure they have the best policies, and procedures to combat security risks.
Yes, ITACS students can pose information security risks to Temple University and to one another. Much like employees can be a risk to their companies, human errors such as creating weak passwords or falling for phishing schemes can lead to significant security breaches. Even without malicious intent, individuals can inadvertently expose confidential data, potentially leading to catastrophic outcomes. Additionally, the skills acquired in the ITACS program, such as penetration testing, could also present a risk to the school if misused. Hiring ethical hackers, who possess the same curiosity and mindset as malicious hackers, allows organizations to proactively identify vulnerabilities through penetration testing before a real cyberattack occurs. However, if these skills are taught to someone with malicious intent, they could pose a serious threat to the school’s security.
ITACS students represent information security vulnerabilities to Temple University and each other. These security vulnerabilities can be intentional but, in many cases, unintentional. For example, as we learned in Unit 1, one of the challenges facing information security is the general attitude about security. In my experience, I have noticed a lack of cautiousness around potential security breaches. It is not serious to individuals, until it happens to them. When I was in undergrad, I experienced many emails that appeared to be phishing emails. I did not open, but I know that some people may have opened and exposed Temple University to a security attack. Additionally, we read that BYOD (bring your own device) causes institutions and individuals to be open to security breaches. It is harder to manage risk when students are using personal devices. Simply, utilizing public Wi-Fi while accessing Temple sites can be a possible vulnerability. As the author notes, all it takes is a laptop and internet connection to hack
ITACS students at Temple University represent potential security vulnerabilities to both the university and each other, primarily because any device that connects to the internet can be a target for cyberattacks. This includes the various mobile phones, laptops, tablets, and other devices that students regularly connect to campus networks. For example, if an ITACS student connects a personal device to the campus network without proper security measures, such as strong passwords, updated operating systems, or installation of antivirus protection, that device could become vulnerable and may be compromised by an attacker, posing a significant risk to both the student and the university’s network.
A lack of awareness or training among ITACS students can prevent them from recognizing common cyber threats, such as phishing emails, malicious websites, or social engineering tactics. For instance, a student unfamiliar with phishing tactics might unknowingly click on a malicious link in an email, which could allow an attacker to gain access to their personal credentials or even the university’s systems.
ITACS Students represent vulnerabilities to both each other and Temple. To keep this short we all represent vulnerabilities to one another now that we have been given a level of trust and access. Now that we have been given access to the class and the campus we possess higher levels of privilege then a normal person would, and any level of permission given above the norm represents a risk. This is the obvious answer.
What I would like to argue instead is that all humans represent a security risk by the existence of our cooperative nature. This can be seen in the prevalence and success of phishing and spear phishing attempts in the wild. It is human nature to want to trust another to some extent and by that logic every person, every relationship that is given a small amount of trust is a risk that can possibly exploited in a social engineering attempt. I have worked in security for the last 6 years and even though I know that it is not something that should be done I still find myself holding secure doors open for those with full arm loads by default. To me, as I would argue as it is to most people, being see as rude in the now is a much larger and more realistic consequence then the potential of causing a security breach.
ITACS students represent information security vulnerabilities to temple university, vulnerability is a weakness in a network that can be exploited by bad actors, temple university students connect to the school network via phones, laptops and tablets to access the school data for their day-to-day school programs, therefore, bad actors can target the students in so many ways to exploit the vulnerability. Cyber criminals can send phishing email to the students disguising to be a reputable institution or from a higher authority requesting sensitive information, a successful phishing attempt will lead to unauthorized access to systems containing students record. Bad actors can also use this information to perpetuate ransomware where they ask the students to pay money or else they make the information public. Bad students with malicious intent can hack into the school critical information for their selfish interest. The insider knowledge of students is a threat to the school data.
The vulnerability posses by temple university students are the reason why there are strict controls for students accessing the school data from their devices, example of these controls are, the account lock, the muti factor authentication, security awareness training for students etc.