3. “FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template”
The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program’s (FedRAMP) High-Moderate-Low-LI _SaaS_Baseline_System Security Plan (SSP) Template is an elaborate directive that outlines the safety measures for hosting cloud-based applications while adhering to the desired security classification levels.
This “FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template” plays an indispensable role in providing a structured outline, guiding federal organizations, and cloud service providers (CSPs) to develop comprehensive and compliant system security plans. Pre-defined controls bear relevance to the three traffic-light protocol (TLP) classifications – ‘high’, ‘moderate’, and ‘low’, in coordination with the ‘LI_SaaS’ aspect related to Limited Impact Software as a Service.
A unique take on this template is how it interlinks these TLP categories, creating a spectrum of security controls that adjust as per the sensitivity of the data. This ensures a robust framework that is versatile and adaptive, thereby heightening the overall security architecture.
The ‘LI_SaaS’ facet commensurately complements these categories by providing finite controls specific to Limited Impact Software as a Service solution, showcasing the template’s remit to address various SaaS deployments.
In conclusion, the “FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template” represents a potent tool, enabling CSPs to align with controls relevant to their offerings, thus promoting the creation of secure, resilient, and efficient cloud environments.
The “FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template” is a comprehensive cybersecurity blueprint designed to streamline the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) approval process for Software as a Service (SaaS) providers. The template illustrates a meticulous organization of security controls depending on their categorization as high, moderate, or low impact levels.
It serves as a robust guideline to help understand the diverse complexity of security controls required at different risk assessment levels. The template further aids SaaS providers in demonstrating how their systems safeguard federal information, thereby expediting the process of gaining authorization to operate on federal networks.
Simply put, the ‘FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template’ is a crucial tool for SaaS providers eyeing to tap into federal markets. It is a testament to their commitment towards protecting sensitive federal information by adhering to stringent standards of cybersecurity. The template is designed to secure a smoother, more efficient path towards FedRAMP accreditation, ultimately fostering improved security and trust among federal agencies and network users. It’s about making complex cybersecurity control requirements understandable and achievable, allowing SaaS providers to navigate federal requirements effectively.
Hi Ikenna,
I completely agree with your assessment of the document as “Robust Guideline”. It addresses a wide range of topics and appears to be designed to collect as much relevant information as possible.
This is another interesting document, dubbed the “security blueprint” it details who are all the responsible parties. I love the detail that has gone into the information requirements. It is the ultimate checks and balance document accounting for the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) and all the individuals who access the system and who is responsible for what duties. Again, if these is what were are going to be working on, this a great template.
Your appreciation for this security blueprint in detailing the responsible parties and information requirements is well-placed, having a comprehensive document that clearly outlines the roles and responsibilities of the CSP and individuals accessing the system is crucial for effective security management. It’s indeed a valuable template for guiding security practices. What aspects stood out to you the most in terms of ensuring accountability and transparency among the parties involved? Also considering the dynamic nature of cloud environments, how do you envision adapting and updating this security blueprint to address emerging security challenges and technological advancements?
As we follow up on NIST SP 800-18r1, the FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template is an outline for documenting exactly who has what obligations in an organization’s security plan. My takeaway from this article was to really appreciate just ho thorough these guidelines are. Being able to see 50 pages of information required to even set up a baseline plan for a system, let alone a more advanced plan, is truly staggering and very thorough. I’m amazed by how specific and ordered everything is even from a top-down level and how these guidelines exist to ensure that all systems are properly documented and managed
I was saying the same thing when I read through the FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template. The detailed information that is required to be completed is truly mind-blowing. For what we will be doing in class I believe this document provides a great template to get us started. It is the ultimate who is doing what, when, why, and how document which is required is these types of environments.
Hello Andrew, I agree with you regarding the appreciation of how thorough the guidelines are. Whenever working in any field, we must remind ourselves that our job is slightly easier because someone before us decided to put in the extra work. If anything, it should be what influences us to go the extra mile, so that the people in the future will have an easier time. that being said, I do wonder how important it is that the document have so many pages and be as detailed as it is. I can imagine for some people they may have a difficult time going through every part or might just lose all motivation and be steered away due to the size of the document. That could be an issue more so with the employee rather than the document itself.
FedRAMP stands for Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program is a government-wide program that provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services. FedRAMP program categorizes cloud services into different impact levels based on the sensitivity and impact of the data stored, each impact level has separate security controls that include the applicable controls for the particular security baseline.
The SSP template system addresses all FedRAMP baselines. The document outlines the system architecture,security controls and measures implemented by a cloud service providers(CSPs) to protect the information and systems within the Federal environment. The SSP provide a detailed overview of how the system is secured and how it meets the requirements of FedRAMP and also provides a sense of transparency and accountability as its list all the involved individuals and the role they play in securing the environment.
Hi Mariam, I lie how you explain that FedRAMP offers a standardized approach for assessing and monitoring cloud products and services across the government. I appreciate how it categorizes cloud services based on data sensitivity, tailoring security controls to different impact levels. The System Security Plan template is a key aspect, providing details on system architecture and security measures implemented by Cloud Service Providers (CSPs). This not only ensures transparency and accountability but also aligns with FedRAMP requirements.
Well, I assume my last post was heard as this article goes in depth on the security plan and also has attributes of the NIST 800 reading we are doing this week along with FIPPS 199 categorization. I felt that this reading is starting to put it into perspective as its somewhat like a template for a security plan but it also ties in all the NIST, FIPS 199 and the CIA. Also, with the professor saying that he wants us to start our group project sooner than later makes sense now, as this, I assume, will be the blueprint we will be using for the security project. With that being said, what stood out for me was pg. 20 how the diagram should be done, it gives clear instructions and step by step commands that clearly outline how the diagram should be done.
Certainly, your observation about the article providing a comprehensive view of the security plan and aligning with NIST 800 and FIPS 199 categorization is noteworthy. The integration of these frameworks is essential for creating a robust and standardized security plan.
It also serves as a valuable resource not only for understanding security concepts but also as a practical guide for implementing them.
Being someone who has zero experience working in cyber security/IT Auding, this document seemed a little confusing to me, but interesting nonetheless. In the beginning, it makes it clear to me that the SSP is very important, as it’s a security blueprint for a CSO. This covers all points by listing out the system information, system owner, Assignment of a Security Responsibility, Leveraged Authorized Services, External Systems and Services that don’t have authorization, and ending with Separation of duties. It’s clear to me this would be something we could very likely encounter in the workplace. This document, as the introduction says- is a clear blueprint that we ourselves can use. Seems to me like we would need to have full knowledge of the company and if not, do thorough research. One thing that I do wonder though is how often would something like this be used?
These are all great points Hashem. It’s interesting to read something like this since this seems much more like an interactive template than it is a reading document. It seems to me that this template is essential when setting up a security architecture plan, especially for a new organization or one that does not have a system in place. Being able to properly classify what data an organization will be handling, as well as who will handle it are necessary for creating a reliable plan of action for mitigation and response
The FedRAMP document is a template system security plan that outlines a fill-in option for anyone developing a system security plan. One section that stood out to me that I want to look into is section 8, the Illustrated Architecture and Narratives section. The section of the template requires an illustrated architecture including authorization boundary and data flows as well as a narrative that describes the IT environment and systems in place, From what I can tell, this is one of the most important sections as it bridges the gap between IT terminology and creating a digestible, easy-to-understand portion that outlines the necessity of the security plan.
A key point I took away is the significance of the System Security Plan (SSP) as the “security blueprint” of a Cloud Service Offering (CSO). The SSP plays a crucial role in defining the CSO’s authorization boundary and articulating the security controls implemented to safeguard the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of both the system and federal data it manages. The document is tailored for Cloud Service Providers seeking Joint Authorization Board provisional authorization or agency authorization through FedRAMP. The emphasis on accuracy and completeness in describing the CSO’s attributes, including Digital Identity Level, FIPS PUB 199 Level, and a fully operational status, ensures a thorough representation for assessment and accreditation within the FedRAMP framework.
I find it interesting how you designate SSP’s as “security blueprints” for Cloud Service. Even beyond the scope of Cloud assets, security plans are essential in maintaining a good understanding of important assets as well as ownership of assets and illustrating the state of assets in a meaningful way for the organization.
I’m a fan of this template as it really does include a lot of nitpicky details that should be present in all security plans. One of the parts of the template I found more interesting and pretty high up there in importance was the separation of duties section which had a table for all individuals/roles within the system and was intended to make a clear duty description between different roles as well as what they have access to, what permissions they’re able to execute. This clears up any confusion regarding roles as well as makes sure they don’t have too much access.
I agree that having a section dedicated to separation of duties is especially important for a security plan. Implementing separation of duties in general is a good security practice to prevent one person from knowing everything and having access to everything as well as limiting a single point-of-failure.
I agree with your assessment of the FedRAMP SSP template. The inclusion of a detailed separation of duties (SOD) section is indeed valuable and contributes significantly to a robust security plan. While it can slow things down (I’m dealing with an issue now where I don’t have access to a specific security tool precisely because of SOD) when you have to rely on other users or teams for help, that is a minor issue when the greater good of the company’s reputation is at stake.
The FedRAMP System Security Plan (SSP) serves as a comprehensive template for documenting an organization’s information security plan. This template facilitates clarity regarding the origin of controls, ensuring that responsibilities for implementation, management, and monitoring are clearly assigned. The plan includes a dedicated section for laws and regulations, guaranteeing compliance with local and federal laws. Access control is another critical component, ensuring that the right authority has access, while unauthorized users are restricted. Security awareness and training are addressed to keep employees updated on relevant policies and procedures.
The SSP acts as a vital database for all information security matters, serving as a reference for any issues related to an organization’s information security. It plays a crucial role in preventing potential problems that may arise in the future.
You are on point Chidiebere, the FedRAMP System Security Plan (SSP) is a comprehensive blueprint for organizational information security, delineating control mandates, ensuring legal compliance, restricting unwarranted access, and spearheading security training. It serves as a primary reference point, mitigating potential future risk surrounding information security.
The purpose of the FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low template is to provide a standardized framework for cloud service providers (CSPs) to develop security plans that meet FedRAMP requirements across different impact levels (High, Moderate, Low, and Low-Impact Software as a Service). Facilitate consistent and efficient assessment of cloud systems by FedRAMP assessors and streamline the authorization process for CSPs seeking FedRAMP authorization. It addresses a broad range of security controls, including Access control, Audit and accountability, Awareness and training, Configuration management, Identification and authentication, Incident response, Personnel security, Risk assessment, and many others. It also allows CSPs to customize the plan to align with their specific system architecture, operational environment, and security controls. Benefits include Enhanced security posture for cloud systems, Reduced time and effort for FedRAMP authorization, Increased confidence in cloud security for federal agencies, and improved standardization and consistency in cloud security practices.
FedRAMP is a government-sponsored initiative that uses a risk-based approach to incorporate cloud-based services for federal information support. FedRAMP details how NIST can be used to assess a third party’s security posture by allowing government agencies to evaluate the risk profile of a system. It also provides information on the status, control, and approach taken for implementing the control summary.
I found the FedRAMP’s decision to distinguish between Security Awareness Training and Role-Based Security Training was interesting and important. Within an organization, leaders must tailor training to each group. Some groups, such as IT, will require more comprehensive security awareness training, whereas others, such as those in administrative roles, will require less or different training. A distinction is important because a blanket cybersecurity policy that only provides uniform training is likely to fail.
Hi Samuel,
I agree with you regarding having different training for the users. Since users would be assigned privileges based on their roles within an organization, it is important to tailor the training based on their roles and what they have access to. For example, an IT tech should be trained on how to users’ credentials private or confidential. A Regular user doesn’t need this training because they don’t have access to other people’s credentials.
Michael Obiukwu says
3. “FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template”
The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program’s (FedRAMP) High-Moderate-Low-LI _SaaS_Baseline_System Security Plan (SSP) Template is an elaborate directive that outlines the safety measures for hosting cloud-based applications while adhering to the desired security classification levels.
This “FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template” plays an indispensable role in providing a structured outline, guiding federal organizations, and cloud service providers (CSPs) to develop comprehensive and compliant system security plans. Pre-defined controls bear relevance to the three traffic-light protocol (TLP) classifications – ‘high’, ‘moderate’, and ‘low’, in coordination with the ‘LI_SaaS’ aspect related to Limited Impact Software as a Service.
A unique take on this template is how it interlinks these TLP categories, creating a spectrum of security controls that adjust as per the sensitivity of the data. This ensures a robust framework that is versatile and adaptive, thereby heightening the overall security architecture.
The ‘LI_SaaS’ facet commensurately complements these categories by providing finite controls specific to Limited Impact Software as a Service solution, showcasing the template’s remit to address various SaaS deployments.
In conclusion, the “FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template” represents a potent tool, enabling CSPs to align with controls relevant to their offerings, thus promoting the creation of secure, resilient, and efficient cloud environments.
Ikenna Alajemba says
The “FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template” is a comprehensive cybersecurity blueprint designed to streamline the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) approval process for Software as a Service (SaaS) providers. The template illustrates a meticulous organization of security controls depending on their categorization as high, moderate, or low impact levels.
It serves as a robust guideline to help understand the diverse complexity of security controls required at different risk assessment levels. The template further aids SaaS providers in demonstrating how their systems safeguard federal information, thereby expediting the process of gaining authorization to operate on federal networks.
Simply put, the ‘FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template’ is a crucial tool for SaaS providers eyeing to tap into federal markets. It is a testament to their commitment towards protecting sensitive federal information by adhering to stringent standards of cybersecurity. The template is designed to secure a smoother, more efficient path towards FedRAMP accreditation, ultimately fostering improved security and trust among federal agencies and network users. It’s about making complex cybersecurity control requirements understandable and achievable, allowing SaaS providers to navigate federal requirements effectively.
Samuel Omotosho says
Hi Ikenna,
I completely agree with your assessment of the document as “Robust Guideline”. It addresses a wide range of topics and appears to be designed to collect as much relevant information as possible.
Erskine Payton says
This is another interesting document, dubbed the “security blueprint” it details who are all the responsible parties. I love the detail that has gone into the information requirements. It is the ultimate checks and balance document accounting for the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) and all the individuals who access the system and who is responsible for what duties. Again, if these is what were are going to be working on, this a great template.
Alex Ruiz says
Your appreciation for this security blueprint in detailing the responsible parties and information requirements is well-placed, having a comprehensive document that clearly outlines the roles and responsibilities of the CSP and individuals accessing the system is crucial for effective security management. It’s indeed a valuable template for guiding security practices. What aspects stood out to you the most in terms of ensuring accountability and transparency among the parties involved? Also considering the dynamic nature of cloud environments, how do you envision adapting and updating this security blueprint to address emerging security challenges and technological advancements?
Andrew Young says
As we follow up on NIST SP 800-18r1, the FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template is an outline for documenting exactly who has what obligations in an organization’s security plan. My takeaway from this article was to really appreciate just ho thorough these guidelines are. Being able to see 50 pages of information required to even set up a baseline plan for a system, let alone a more advanced plan, is truly staggering and very thorough. I’m amazed by how specific and ordered everything is even from a top-down level and how these guidelines exist to ensure that all systems are properly documented and managed
Erskine Payton says
I was saying the same thing when I read through the FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low-LI_SaaS-Baseline-System Security Plan (SSP) Template. The detailed information that is required to be completed is truly mind-blowing. For what we will be doing in class I believe this document provides a great template to get us started. It is the ultimate who is doing what, when, why, and how document which is required is these types of environments.
Hashem Alsharif says
Hello Andrew, I agree with you regarding the appreciation of how thorough the guidelines are. Whenever working in any field, we must remind ourselves that our job is slightly easier because someone before us decided to put in the extra work. If anything, it should be what influences us to go the extra mile, so that the people in the future will have an easier time. that being said, I do wonder how important it is that the document have so many pages and be as detailed as it is. I can imagine for some people they may have a difficult time going through every part or might just lose all motivation and be steered away due to the size of the document. That could be an issue more so with the employee rather than the document itself.
Mariam Hazali says
FedRAMP stands for Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program is a government-wide program that provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services. FedRAMP program categorizes cloud services into different impact levels based on the sensitivity and impact of the data stored, each impact level has separate security controls that include the applicable controls for the particular security baseline.
The SSP template system addresses all FedRAMP baselines. The document outlines the system architecture,security controls and measures implemented by a cloud service providers(CSPs) to protect the information and systems within the Federal environment. The SSP provide a detailed overview of how the system is secured and how it meets the requirements of FedRAMP and also provides a sense of transparency and accountability as its list all the involved individuals and the role they play in securing the environment.
Nicholas Nirenberg says
Hi Mariam, I lie how you explain that FedRAMP offers a standardized approach for assessing and monitoring cloud products and services across the government. I appreciate how it categorizes cloud services based on data sensitivity, tailoring security controls to different impact levels. The System Security Plan template is a key aspect, providing details on system architecture and security measures implemented by Cloud Service Providers (CSPs). This not only ensures transparency and accountability but also aligns with FedRAMP requirements.
Jeffrey Sullivan says
Well, I assume my last post was heard as this article goes in depth on the security plan and also has attributes of the NIST 800 reading we are doing this week along with FIPPS 199 categorization. I felt that this reading is starting to put it into perspective as its somewhat like a template for a security plan but it also ties in all the NIST, FIPS 199 and the CIA. Also, with the professor saying that he wants us to start our group project sooner than later makes sense now, as this, I assume, will be the blueprint we will be using for the security project. With that being said, what stood out for me was pg. 20 how the diagram should be done, it gives clear instructions and step by step commands that clearly outline how the diagram should be done.
Chidiebere Okafor says
Certainly, your observation about the article providing a comprehensive view of the security plan and aligning with NIST 800 and FIPS 199 categorization is noteworthy. The integration of these frameworks is essential for creating a robust and standardized security plan.
It also serves as a valuable resource not only for understanding security concepts but also as a practical guide for implementing them.
Hashem Alsharif says
Being someone who has zero experience working in cyber security/IT Auding, this document seemed a little confusing to me, but interesting nonetheless. In the beginning, it makes it clear to me that the SSP is very important, as it’s a security blueprint for a CSO. This covers all points by listing out the system information, system owner, Assignment of a Security Responsibility, Leveraged Authorized Services, External Systems and Services that don’t have authorization, and ending with Separation of duties. It’s clear to me this would be something we could very likely encounter in the workplace. This document, as the introduction says- is a clear blueprint that we ourselves can use. Seems to me like we would need to have full knowledge of the company and if not, do thorough research. One thing that I do wonder though is how often would something like this be used?
Andrew Young says
These are all great points Hashem. It’s interesting to read something like this since this seems much more like an interactive template than it is a reading document. It seems to me that this template is essential when setting up a security architecture plan, especially for a new organization or one that does not have a system in place. Being able to properly classify what data an organization will be handling, as well as who will handle it are necessary for creating a reliable plan of action for mitigation and response
Kenneth Saltisky says
The FedRAMP document is a template system security plan that outlines a fill-in option for anyone developing a system security plan. One section that stood out to me that I want to look into is section 8, the Illustrated Architecture and Narratives section. The section of the template requires an illustrated architecture including authorization boundary and data flows as well as a narrative that describes the IT environment and systems in place, From what I can tell, this is one of the most important sections as it bridges the gap between IT terminology and creating a digestible, easy-to-understand portion that outlines the necessity of the security plan.
Nicholas Nirenberg says
A key point I took away is the significance of the System Security Plan (SSP) as the “security blueprint” of a Cloud Service Offering (CSO). The SSP plays a crucial role in defining the CSO’s authorization boundary and articulating the security controls implemented to safeguard the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of both the system and federal data it manages. The document is tailored for Cloud Service Providers seeking Joint Authorization Board provisional authorization or agency authorization through FedRAMP. The emphasis on accuracy and completeness in describing the CSO’s attributes, including Digital Identity Level, FIPS PUB 199 Level, and a fully operational status, ensures a thorough representation for assessment and accreditation within the FedRAMP framework.
Kenneth Saltisky says
Hi Nicholas,
I find it interesting how you designate SSP’s as “security blueprints” for Cloud Service. Even beyond the scope of Cloud assets, security plans are essential in maintaining a good understanding of important assets as well as ownership of assets and illustrating the state of assets in a meaningful way for the organization.
Alex Ruiz says
I’m a fan of this template as it really does include a lot of nitpicky details that should be present in all security plans. One of the parts of the template I found more interesting and pretty high up there in importance was the separation of duties section which had a table for all individuals/roles within the system and was intended to make a clear duty description between different roles as well as what they have access to, what permissions they’re able to execute. This clears up any confusion regarding roles as well as makes sure they don’t have too much access.
Kenneth Saltisky says
Hi Alex,
I agree that having a section dedicated to separation of duties is especially important for a security plan. Implementing separation of duties in general is a good security practice to prevent one person from knowing everything and having access to everything as well as limiting a single point-of-failure.
Kelly Conger says
Alex,
I agree with your assessment of the FedRAMP SSP template. The inclusion of a detailed separation of duties (SOD) section is indeed valuable and contributes significantly to a robust security plan. While it can slow things down (I’m dealing with an issue now where I don’t have access to a specific security tool precisely because of SOD) when you have to rely on other users or teams for help, that is a minor issue when the greater good of the company’s reputation is at stake.
Chidiebere Okafor says
The FedRAMP System Security Plan (SSP) serves as a comprehensive template for documenting an organization’s information security plan. This template facilitates clarity regarding the origin of controls, ensuring that responsibilities for implementation, management, and monitoring are clearly assigned. The plan includes a dedicated section for laws and regulations, guaranteeing compliance with local and federal laws. Access control is another critical component, ensuring that the right authority has access, while unauthorized users are restricted. Security awareness and training are addressed to keep employees updated on relevant policies and procedures.
The SSP acts as a vital database for all information security matters, serving as a reference for any issues related to an organization’s information security. It plays a crucial role in preventing potential problems that may arise in the future.
Ikenna Alajemba says
You are on point Chidiebere, the FedRAMP System Security Plan (SSP) is a comprehensive blueprint for organizational information security, delineating control mandates, ensuring legal compliance, restricting unwarranted access, and spearheading security training. It serves as a primary reference point, mitigating potential future risk surrounding information security.
Kelly Conger says
The purpose of the FedRAMP-High-Moderate-Low template is to provide a standardized framework for cloud service providers (CSPs) to develop security plans that meet FedRAMP requirements across different impact levels (High, Moderate, Low, and Low-Impact Software as a Service). Facilitate consistent and efficient assessment of cloud systems by FedRAMP assessors and streamline the authorization process for CSPs seeking FedRAMP authorization. It addresses a broad range of security controls, including Access control, Audit and accountability, Awareness and training, Configuration management, Identification and authentication, Incident response, Personnel security, Risk assessment, and many others. It also allows CSPs to customize the plan to align with their specific system architecture, operational environment, and security controls. Benefits include Enhanced security posture for cloud systems, Reduced time and effort for FedRAMP authorization, Increased confidence in cloud security for federal agencies, and improved standardization and consistency in cloud security practices.
Akintunde Akinmusire says
FedRAMP is a government-sponsored initiative that uses a risk-based approach to incorporate cloud-based services for federal information support. FedRAMP details how NIST can be used to assess a third party’s security posture by allowing government agencies to evaluate the risk profile of a system. It also provides information on the status, control, and approach taken for implementing the control summary.
Samuel Omotosho says
I found the FedRAMP’s decision to distinguish between Security Awareness Training and Role-Based Security Training was interesting and important. Within an organization, leaders must tailor training to each group. Some groups, such as IT, will require more comprehensive security awareness training, whereas others, such as those in administrative roles, will require less or different training. A distinction is important because a blanket cybersecurity policy that only provides uniform training is likely to fail.
Akintunde Akinmusire says
Hi Samuel,
I agree with you regarding having different training for the users. Since users would be assigned privileges based on their roles within an organization, it is important to tailor the training based on their roles and what they have access to. For example, an IT tech should be trained on how to users’ credentials private or confidential. A Regular user doesn’t need this training because they don’t have access to other people’s credentials.