Identification is the process of verifying digital identity and establishing contact with the real identity of the subject. Therefore, identity evidence must be collected to determine the authenticity, effectiveness and accuracy of digital identity and real identity. Identification evidence can include information such as first name, last name or date of birth. However, in order to be effective, the process should try to use as few attributes as possible and use social security numbers only when absolutely necessary. The publication points out that the verification process includes three main steps: collecting appropriate identity evidence, confirming the authenticity of the evidence, and confirming that the data contained in the identity evidence is valid, up-to-date and relevant to real-life topics.
These guidelines provide technical requirements for federal agencies implementing digital identity services and are not intended to limit the development or use of standards beyond this purpose. Digital Authentication. At the heart of this is a process known as identity proofing, in which the applicant provides evidence to the credentialing service provider. The applicant provides credible proof of identity to the credentialing service provider (CSP) In this process, the applicant provides credible proof of identity to the credentialing service provider (CSP), thereby enabling the CSP to assert that level of identity with a useful level of identity assurance. This document defines the technical requirements for each of the three levels of identity assurance.
The goal of identity resolution is to uniquely distinguish an individual within a given population or context. Effective identity resolution uses the smallest set of attributes necessary to resolve to a unique individual.
The goal of identity validation is to collect the most appropriate identity evidence (e.g., a passport or driver’s license) from the applicant and determine its authenticity, validity, and accuracy.
The goal of identity resolution is to uniquely distinguish an individual within a given population or context.
The goal of identity validation is to collect the most appropriate identity evidence (e.g., a passport or driver’s license) from the applicant and determine its authenticity, validity, and accuracy.
The goal of identity verification is to confirm and establish a linkage between the claimed identity and the real-life existence of the subject presenting the evidence
Identity proofing’s sole objective is to ensure the applicant is who they claim to be to a stated level of certitude. This includes presentation, validation, and verification of the minimum attributes necessary to accomplish identity proofing. There may be many different sets that suffice as the minimum, so CSPs should choose this set to balance privacy and the user’s usability needs, as well as the likely attributes needed in future uses of the digital identity.An applicant undergoes an identity proofing and enrollment process whereby their identity evidence and attributes are collected, uniquely resolved to a single identity within a given population or context, then validated and verified.
These guidelines provide technical requirements for federal agencies implementing digital
identity services and are not intended to constrain the development or use of standards outside of
this purpose. This guideline focuses on the enrollment and verification of an identity for use in
digital authentication. Central to this is a process known as identity proofing in which an
applicant provides evidence to a credential service provider (CSP) reliably identifying
themselves, thereby allowing the CSP to assert that identification at a useful identity assurance
level.
One point i want to talk about are Identification assurance level requirements and the steps involved in the applicant’s identification and registration process. The sole purpose of identification is to verify whether the person is the person they claim. Figure 4.1 outlines the basic process of authentication and registration. First, collect the applicant’s core attributes and evidence from the applicant, such as PII and two forms of identity evidence, then verify the evidence by checking the authoritative source, and finally verify the evidence when CSP requires to send the applicant’s photo and registration code to its verification mobile phone. After completing these steps, the applicant will be successfully proved.
The goal of identity resolution is to uniquely distinguish an individual within a given population or context. Effective identity resolution uses the smallest set of attributes necessary to resolve to a unique individual. It provides the CSP an important starting point in the overall identity proofing process, to include the initial detection of potential fraud, but in no way represents complete and successful identity proofing transaction.
The goal of identity verification is to confirm and establish a linkage between the claimed identity and the real-life existence of the subject presenting the evidence.
The identification and registration process has three steps, including parsing, verification, and verification. The National Security Council first collects an index of the applicant’s personal information, then checks the authorized source to ensure that the information provided matches its records, and finally matches the photo provided by the applicant with documents such as licenses, passports, etc. Once all of the above certifications have been certified by the Chief Superintendent, the applicant is considered to have successfully certified.
The most impressive part I think that this book also details the responsibilities of Credential Service Providers (CSPs) with respect to establishing and maintaining enrollment records and binding authenticators (either CSP-issued or subscriber-provided) to the enrollment record.
The goal of identity verification is to collect the most appropriate proof of identity from the applicant to a prescribed level of certainty and to establish its authenticity, validity and accuracy.
At the heart of digital authentication is the authentication process, in which an applicant provides a reliable proof of identity to a certificate service provider (CSP), allowing the CSP to assert the level of that identity with a useful identity guarantee.
The goal of identity verification is to collect the most appropriate proof of identity from the applicant to a prescribed level of certainty and to establish its authenticity, validity and accuracy.
One of the challenges associated with digital identity is the association of a set of online activities with a single specific entity.Identification is the process of verifying digital identity and establishing contact with the real identity of the subject. Therefore, identity evidence must be collected to determine the authenticity, effectiveness and accuracy of digital identity and real identity. The publication points out that the verification process includes three main steps: collecting appropriate identity evidence, confirming the authenticity of the evidence, and confirming that the data contained in the identity evidence is valid, up-to-date and relevant to real-life topics.
One point of great interest to me is that there are two general categories of threats to the enrollment process: impersonation, and either compromise or malfeasance of the infrastructure provider.Threats to the enrollment process include impersonation attacks and threats to the transport mechanisms for identity proofing, authenticator binding, and credential issuance. This document also details the responsibilities of Credential Service Providers (CSPs) with respect to establishing and maintaining enrollment records and binding authenticators (either CSP-issued or subscriber-provided) to the enrollmentrecord.
Collecting identity evidence to determine the authenticity, validity, and accuracy of digital and real identities is essentially the process of verifying digital identities and establishing a connection with the subject’s true identity. Proof of identification can include information such as first name, last name or date of birth. However, to be effective, the process should try to use as few attributes as possible, and only use social security numbers when absolutely necessary.
Based on the reading, it is important to understand the privacy considerations of identity enrollment and proofing. A major part of this is minimizing the collection of data so that only information necessary for proofing is requested and stored. The proofing requirements specify the acceptability, validation, and verification of the identity evidence that the subscriber will provide to support its identity claim. There are three types of identity assurance levels (IALs) for a subscriber’s identity. Level 1 being that there is not requirement to determine if the subject’s real-life identity, level 2 the subject’s identity must be identities and associated with an real identity but can be either remote or physically-present identity proofing, and level 3 which requires physical presence and must be verified by an authorized CSP.
This section outlines the process on how applicants can prove their identities and enroll in an identity system. The quality requirements are defined and included in the document as well as the threat mitigation strategies. The key takeaway from this document is that IAL1 is the least secure identification method for assurance levels.
This document describes the common pattern in which an applicant undergoes an identity proofing and enrollment process whereby their identity evidence and attributes are collected, uniquely resolved to a single identity within a given population or context, then validated and verified. One of the challenges associated with digital identity is the association of a set of online activities with a single specific entity. Identity proofing’s sole objective is to ensure the applicant is who they claim to be to a stated level of certitude. This includes presentation, validation, and verification of the minimum attributes necessary to accomplish identity proofing.An enrollment code allows the CSP to confirm that the applicant controls an address of record, as well as offering the applicant the ability to reestablish binding to their enrollment record.
The goal of identity validation is to collect the most appropriate identity evidence (e.g., a passport or driver’s license) from the applicant and determine its authenticity, validity, and accuracy. Identity validation is made up of three process steps: collecting the appropriate identity evidence, confirming the evidence is genuine and authentic, and confirming the data contained on the identity evidence is valid, current, and related to a real-life subject.
In this guideline I know that assurance in a subscriber’s identity is described using one of three IALs:
IAL1: There is no requirement to link the applicant to a specific real-life identity.
IAL2: Evidence supports the real-world existence of the claimed identity and verifies that the applicant is appropriately associated with this real-world identity. A CSP that supports IAL2 can support IAL1 transactions if the user consents.
IAL3: Physical presence is required for identity proofing. Identifying attributes must be verified by an authorized and trained CSP representative. A CSP that supports IAL3 can support IAL1 and IAL2 identity attributes if the user consents.
This document provides requirements for enrollment and identity proofing of applicants that wish to gain access to resources at each Identity Assurance Level (IAL). The requirements detail the acceptability, validation, and verification of identity evidence that will be presented by a subscriber to support their claim of identity. Sometime, it is difficult to associate of a set of online activities with a single specific entity. This article give a solution to us. Assurance in a subscriber’s identity is described using one of three IALs. There are three levels. The next is Identity proofing’s sole objective is to ensure the applicant is who they claim to be to a stated level of certitude. Otherwsie, CSP is a effective way too. The CSP SHALL verify identity evidence as follows:
1. At a minimum, the applicant’s binding to identity evidence must be verified by a process that is able to achieve a strength of SUPERIOR.
2. KBV SHALL NOT be used for in-person (physical or supervised remote) identity verification.
The goal of identity resolution.
Identity resolution has two parts: automatic profile matching and automatic merging of similar profiles. To identify similar profiles, identity resolution uses machine learning to view the following personally identifiable information (PII) attributes in each profile.
The matching group consists of all similar profiles that represent the customer.
After the automatic matching process runs, you can query the S3 bucket or use getMatchesAPI to filter the results based on confidence scores.
I learned something about deriving credentials.Deriving credentials is based on the process of an individual proving to a CSP that they are the rightful subject of an identity record (i.e., a credential) that is bound to one or more authenticators they possess. This process is made available by a CSP that wants individuals to have an opportunity to obtain new authenticators bound to the existing, identity proofed record, or credential. As minimizing the number of times the identity proofing process is repeated benefits the individual and CSP, deriving identity is accomplished by proving possession and successful authentication of an authenticator that is already bound to the original, proofed digital
Identity proofing’s sole objective is to ensure the applicant is who they claim to be to a stated level of certitude. This includes presentation, validation, and verification of the minimum attributes necessary to accomplish identity proofing. There may be many different sets that suffice as the minimum, so CSPs should choose this set to balance privacy and the user’s usability needs, as well as the likely attributes needed in future uses of the digital identity.An applicant undergoes an identity proofing and enrollment process whereby their identity evidence and attributes are collected, uniquely resolved to a single identity within a given population or context, then validated and verified.
Based on this article, the contents of this article talked about the methods of implementing enrollment and identity proofing, and it described the requirements of enrollment and identity proofing, for example, the CSP shall provide explicit notice to the applicant at the time of collection regarding the purpose for collecting and maintaining a record of the attributes necessary for identity proofing.
The purpose of the applicant’s identity verification is to determine the authenticity, accuracy and effectiveness of the applicant’s identity verification. The verification process consists of three main steps: collecting appropriate identity evidence, confirming the authenticity of the evidence, and confirming that the data contained in the identity evidence is valid, up-to-date and relevant to real-life topics. But what I want to talk about is that if possible, it is really necessary to collect information according to social identification number or passport number as little as possible. A safer way is to collect information according to personal attributes, such as fingerprint, DNA, blood attributes and voiceprint. Of course, these costs are relatively high, but if certain technologies are developed, they can be collected at a lower cost, This is more reliable than social numbers.
One of the challenges associated with digital identity is the association of a set of online activities with a single specific entity.Identification is the process of verifying digital identity and establishing contact with the real identity of the subject. Therefore, identity evidence must be collected to determine the authenticity, effectiveness and accuracy of digital identity and real identity. The publication points out that the verification process includes three main steps: collecting appropriate identity evidence, confirming the authenticity of the evidence, and confirming that the data contained in the identity evidence is valid, up-to-date and relevant to real-life topics
NIST SP 800 63A “Digital Identity Guidelines Enrollment and Identity Proofing” provides requirements for enrollment and identity proofing of applicants that wish to gain access to resources at each Identity Assurance Level (IAL). The requirements detai the acceptability, validation,and verification of identity evidence that will be presented by a subscriber to support their claim of identity. It also details the responsibilities of Credential Service Providers(CSPs)with respect to establishing and maintaining enrollment records and binding authenticators (either CSP-issued or subscriber-provided) to the enrollment record.
Xiaomeng Chen says
Identification is the process of verifying digital identity and establishing contact with the real identity of the subject. Therefore, identity evidence must be collected to determine the authenticity, effectiveness and accuracy of digital identity and real identity. Identification evidence can include information such as first name, last name or date of birth. However, in order to be effective, the process should try to use as few attributes as possible and use social security numbers only when absolutely necessary. The publication points out that the verification process includes three main steps: collecting appropriate identity evidence, confirming the authenticity of the evidence, and confirming that the data contained in the identity evidence is valid, up-to-date and relevant to real-life topics.
Weiwei Zhao says
These guidelines provide technical requirements for federal agencies implementing digital identity services and are not intended to limit the development or use of standards beyond this purpose. Digital Authentication. At the heart of this is a process known as identity proofing, in which the applicant provides evidence to the credentialing service provider. The applicant provides credible proof of identity to the credentialing service provider (CSP) In this process, the applicant provides credible proof of identity to the credentialing service provider (CSP), thereby enabling the CSP to assert that level of identity with a useful level of identity assurance. This document defines the technical requirements for each of the three levels of identity assurance.
Zhiyuan Lian says
The goal of identity resolution is to uniquely distinguish an individual within a given population or context. Effective identity resolution uses the smallest set of attributes necessary to resolve to a unique individual.
The goal of identity validation is to collect the most appropriate identity evidence (e.g., a passport or driver’s license) from the applicant and determine its authenticity, validity, and accuracy.
Haoyu Bai says
The goal of identity resolution is to uniquely distinguish an individual within a given population or context.
The goal of identity validation is to collect the most appropriate identity evidence (e.g., a passport or driver’s license) from the applicant and determine its authenticity, validity, and accuracy.
The goal of identity verification is to confirm and establish a linkage between the claimed identity and the real-life existence of the subject presenting the evidence
Lisheng Lin says
Identity proofing’s sole objective is to ensure the applicant is who they claim to be to a stated level of certitude. This includes presentation, validation, and verification of the minimum attributes necessary to accomplish identity proofing. There may be many different sets that suffice as the minimum, so CSPs should choose this set to balance privacy and the user’s usability needs, as well as the likely attributes needed in future uses of the digital identity.An applicant undergoes an identity proofing and enrollment process whereby their identity evidence and attributes are collected, uniquely resolved to a single identity within a given population or context, then validated and verified.
Chang Cui says
These guidelines provide technical requirements for federal agencies implementing digital
identity services and are not intended to constrain the development or use of standards outside of
this purpose. This guideline focuses on the enrollment and verification of an identity for use in
digital authentication. Central to this is a process known as identity proofing in which an
applicant provides evidence to a credential service provider (CSP) reliably identifying
themselves, thereby allowing the CSP to assert that identification at a useful identity assurance
level.
Yongheng Luo says
One point i want to talk about are Identification assurance level requirements and the steps involved in the applicant’s identification and registration process. The sole purpose of identification is to verify whether the person is the person they claim. Figure 4.1 outlines the basic process of authentication and registration. First, collect the applicant’s core attributes and evidence from the applicant, such as PII and two forms of identity evidence, then verify the evidence by checking the authoritative source, and finally verify the evidence when CSP requires to send the applicant’s photo and registration code to its verification mobile phone. After completing these steps, the applicant will be successfully proved.
Yuting Yang says
The goal of identity resolution is to uniquely distinguish an individual within a given population or context. Effective identity resolution uses the smallest set of attributes necessary to resolve to a unique individual. It provides the CSP an important starting point in the overall identity proofing process, to include the initial detection of potential fraud, but in no way represents complete and successful identity proofing transaction.
The goal of identity verification is to confirm and establish a linkage between the claimed identity and the real-life existence of the subject presenting the evidence.
Zijie Yuan says
The identification and registration process has three steps, including parsing, verification, and verification. The National Security Council first collects an index of the applicant’s personal information, then checks the authorized source to ensure that the information provided matches its records, and finally matches the photo provided by the applicant with documents such as licenses, passports, etc. Once all of the above certifications have been certified by the Chief Superintendent, the applicant is considered to have successfully certified.
Yue Ma says
The most impressive part I think that this book also details the responsibilities of Credential Service Providers (CSPs) with respect to establishing and maintaining enrollment records and binding authenticators (either CSP-issued or subscriber-provided) to the enrollment record.
Yu Hu says
The goal of identity verification is to collect the most appropriate proof of identity from the applicant to a prescribed level of certainty and to establish its authenticity, validity and accuracy.
Shengjie Zhang says
At the heart of digital authentication is the authentication process, in which an applicant provides a reliable proof of identity to a certificate service provider (CSP), allowing the CSP to assert the level of that identity with a useful identity guarantee.
The goal of identity verification is to collect the most appropriate proof of identity from the applicant to a prescribed level of certainty and to establish its authenticity, validity and accuracy.
Yiqiong Zhang says
One of the challenges associated with digital identity is the association of a set of online activities with a single specific entity.Identification is the process of verifying digital identity and establishing contact with the real identity of the subject. Therefore, identity evidence must be collected to determine the authenticity, effectiveness and accuracy of digital identity and real identity. The publication points out that the verification process includes three main steps: collecting appropriate identity evidence, confirming the authenticity of the evidence, and confirming that the data contained in the identity evidence is valid, up-to-date and relevant to real-life topics.
Shengyuan Yu says
One point of great interest to me is that there are two general categories of threats to the enrollment process: impersonation, and either compromise or malfeasance of the infrastructure provider.Threats to the enrollment process include impersonation attacks and threats to the transport mechanisms for identity proofing, authenticator binding, and credential issuance. This document also details the responsibilities of Credential Service Providers (CSPs) with respect to establishing and maintaining enrollment records and binding authenticators (either CSP-issued or subscriber-provided) to the enrollmentrecord.
Lei Tian says
Collecting identity evidence to determine the authenticity, validity, and accuracy of digital and real identities is essentially the process of verifying digital identities and establishing a connection with the subject’s true identity. Proof of identification can include information such as first name, last name or date of birth. However, to be effective, the process should try to use as few attributes as possible, and only use social security numbers when absolutely necessary.
Xuemeng Li says
Based on the reading, it is important to understand the privacy considerations of identity enrollment and proofing. A major part of this is minimizing the collection of data so that only information necessary for proofing is requested and stored. The proofing requirements specify the acceptability, validation, and verification of the identity evidence that the subscriber will provide to support its identity claim. There are three types of identity assurance levels (IALs) for a subscriber’s identity. Level 1 being that there is not requirement to determine if the subject’s real-life identity, level 2 the subject’s identity must be identities and associated with an real identity but can be either remote or physically-present identity proofing, and level 3 which requires physical presence and must be verified by an authorized CSP.
Xiaohan Chen says
This section outlines the process on how applicants can prove their identities and enroll in an identity system. The quality requirements are defined and included in the document as well as the threat mitigation strategies. The key takeaway from this document is that IAL1 is the least secure identification method for assurance levels.
Tianyu Zhang says
This document describes the common pattern in which an applicant undergoes an identity proofing and enrollment process whereby their identity evidence and attributes are collected, uniquely resolved to a single identity within a given population or context, then validated and verified. One of the challenges associated with digital identity is the association of a set of online activities with a single specific entity. Identity proofing’s sole objective is to ensure the applicant is who they claim to be to a stated level of certitude. This includes presentation, validation, and verification of the minimum attributes necessary to accomplish identity proofing.An enrollment code allows the CSP to confirm that the applicant controls an address of record, as well as offering the applicant the ability to reestablish binding to their enrollment record.
Yalin Zou says
The goal of identity validation is to collect the most appropriate identity evidence (e.g., a passport or driver’s license) from the applicant and determine its authenticity, validity, and accuracy. Identity validation is made up of three process steps: collecting the appropriate identity evidence, confirming the evidence is genuine and authentic, and confirming the data contained on the identity evidence is valid, current, and related to a real-life subject.
Yijing Zhan says
In this guideline I know that assurance in a subscriber’s identity is described using one of three IALs:
IAL1: There is no requirement to link the applicant to a specific real-life identity.
IAL2: Evidence supports the real-world existence of the claimed identity and verifies that the applicant is appropriately associated with this real-world identity. A CSP that supports IAL2 can support IAL1 transactions if the user consents.
IAL3: Physical presence is required for identity proofing. Identifying attributes must be verified by an authorized and trained CSP representative. A CSP that supports IAL3 can support IAL1 and IAL2 identity attributes if the user consents.
Xinyu Dai says
This document provides requirements for enrollment and identity proofing of applicants that wish to gain access to resources at each Identity Assurance Level (IAL). The requirements detail the acceptability, validation, and verification of identity evidence that will be presented by a subscriber to support their claim of identity. Sometime, it is difficult to associate of a set of online activities with a single specific entity. This article give a solution to us. Assurance in a subscriber’s identity is described using one of three IALs. There are three levels. The next is Identity proofing’s sole objective is to ensure the applicant is who they claim to be to a stated level of certitude. Otherwsie, CSP is a effective way too. The CSP SHALL verify identity evidence as follows:
1. At a minimum, the applicant’s binding to identity evidence must be verified by a process that is able to achieve a strength of SUPERIOR.
2. KBV SHALL NOT be used for in-person (physical or supervised remote) identity verification.
Ziqiao Wang says
The goal of identity resolution.
Identity resolution has two parts: automatic profile matching and automatic merging of similar profiles. To identify similar profiles, identity resolution uses machine learning to view the following personally identifiable information (PII) attributes in each profile.
The matching group consists of all similar profiles that represent the customer.
After the automatic matching process runs, you can query the S3 bucket or use getMatchesAPI to filter the results based on confidence scores.
Yanxue Li says
I learned something about deriving credentials.Deriving credentials is based on the process of an individual proving to a CSP that they are the rightful subject of an identity record (i.e., a credential) that is bound to one or more authenticators they possess. This process is made available by a CSP that wants individuals to have an opportunity to obtain new authenticators bound to the existing, identity proofed record, or credential. As minimizing the number of times the identity proofing process is repeated benefits the individual and CSP, deriving identity is accomplished by proving possession and successful authentication of an authenticator that is already bound to the original, proofed digital
Yujia Hu says
Identity proofing’s sole objective is to ensure the applicant is who they claim to be to a stated level of certitude. This includes presentation, validation, and verification of the minimum attributes necessary to accomplish identity proofing. There may be many different sets that suffice as the minimum, so CSPs should choose this set to balance privacy and the user’s usability needs, as well as the likely attributes needed in future uses of the digital identity.An applicant undergoes an identity proofing and enrollment process whereby their identity evidence and attributes are collected, uniquely resolved to a single identity within a given population or context, then validated and verified.
Yutong Sun says
Based on this article, the contents of this article talked about the methods of implementing enrollment and identity proofing, and it described the requirements of enrollment and identity proofing, for example, the CSP shall provide explicit notice to the applicant at the time of collection regarding the purpose for collecting and maintaining a record of the attributes necessary for identity proofing.
Hang Zhao says
The purpose of the applicant’s identity verification is to determine the authenticity, accuracy and effectiveness of the applicant’s identity verification. The verification process consists of three main steps: collecting appropriate identity evidence, confirming the authenticity of the evidence, and confirming that the data contained in the identity evidence is valid, up-to-date and relevant to real-life topics. But what I want to talk about is that if possible, it is really necessary to collect information according to social identification number or passport number as little as possible. A safer way is to collect information according to personal attributes, such as fingerprint, DNA, blood attributes and voiceprint. Of course, these costs are relatively high, but if certain technologies are developed, they can be collected at a lower cost, This is more reliable than social numbers.
Dacheng Xu says
One of the challenges associated with digital identity is the association of a set of online activities with a single specific entity.Identification is the process of verifying digital identity and establishing contact with the real identity of the subject. Therefore, identity evidence must be collected to determine the authenticity, effectiveness and accuracy of digital identity and real identity. The publication points out that the verification process includes three main steps: collecting appropriate identity evidence, confirming the authenticity of the evidence, and confirming that the data contained in the identity evidence is valid, up-to-date and relevant to real-life topics
Ying Cheng says
NIST SP 800 63A “Digital Identity Guidelines Enrollment and Identity Proofing” provides requirements for enrollment and identity proofing of applicants that wish to gain access to resources at each Identity Assurance Level (IAL). The requirements detai the acceptability, validation,and verification of identity evidence that will be presented by a subscriber to support their claim of identity. It also details the responsibilities of Credential Service Providers(CSPs)with respect to establishing and maintaining enrollment records and binding authenticators (either CSP-issued or subscriber-provided) to the enrollment record.