• Log In
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MIS Distinguished Speaker Series

Temple University

January 31: Jesse Bockstead to present on Heterogeneous Problem-Solving Behavior and its Implications for Success in Unblind Innovation Contests

January 30, 2014 By Ermira Zifla

Jesse Bockstead
Assistant Professor
Eller School of Management, University of Arizona

Friday, January 31, 2014
10:00am – 11:30am
Speakman Hall 200

Seminar Title: Heterogeneous Problem-Solving Behavior and its Implications for Success in Unblind Innovation Contests

Abstract

Innovation contests are increasingly adopting an “unblind” format where contest submissions and feedback are viewable by all contestants and the information structure changes dynamically during the contest. In such a format, contestants must weigh the cost of revealing their submissions against the benefits of learning and improvement of their submissions through emerging contest information. We seek to understand how contestants solve problems in unblind innovation contests and what the implications of their problem-solving behavior on contest outcomes are. We analyze problem-solving behavior among contestants in terms of how they make submissions to a contest—i.e., when does a contestant begin participation, how many submissions does a contestant make, what is the number of submissions over which a contestant actively participates, and how are a contestant’s submissions distributed through her active participation. The econometric analysis of a large dataset of unblind innovation contests and participating contestants indicates that, despite the potential for intellectual property loss from revealing of submissions, contestants who make their first submission earlier are more likely to succeed in the contest as their number of submissions increases. We also find that increasing the length of participation in a contest has a strong positive effect on a contestant’s likelihood of success. More importantly, our results indicate that contestants whose submission patterns in a contest exhibit greater positive skewness, mimicking the traditional innovation funnel process, have a higher likelihood of success. Departing from prior studies on “blind” formats, our study provides new evidence that the process of problem solving has significant implications for a contestant’s success, above and beyond her prior experience and success in contests characterized by visible and dynamic information structure.

click here for a copy of the paper.

 

Tagged With:

Primary Sidebar

RSS MIS News

  • MIS Alumni Advisory Board Member, Eric Charran presents to AIS/MIS April 20, 2026
  • Temple AIS Wins Big at 2026 SCLC! March 31, 2026
  • Temple Research Ranked #4 World Wide March 4, 2026
  • Lunch with Temple’s Award-Winning Teachers January 26, 2026
  • Temple AIS Homecoming F2025 October 16, 2025

Tags

AI amrit tiwana Artificial Intelligence blockchain boston college bots brian butler carnegie mellon univ crowd culture deception Deep Learning Design experiment Field Experiment financial technology georgia state georgia tech Healthcare Human vs AI information security Innovation Institutional Theory IT Outsourcing long tail Machine Learning machines Maryland media Online Communities platform privacy productivity Quasi-natural experiment recommender systems simulation Social Capital social media social network steven johnson technology adoption temple univ user generated content UT Dallas wharton

Archives

Copyright © 2026 Department of Management Information Systems · Fox School of Business · Temple University