• Log In
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
    • Instructor
  • Class Materials
    • Classroom Recordings
    • Lectures
  • Class Blogs
    • About Blogs
    • Read Blogs Here
  • Schedule
    • ACL
      • Class 01 – Introduction to the Course and to Fraud
      • Class 02 – Fighting and Preventing Fraud
      • Class 03 – Fraud Detection
      • Class 04 – Data Driven Fraud Detection – Investigating Concealment and Money Laundering
    • ACL Labs
      • Lab 01 – Install ACL / Review and Work with On-Line Documentation
      • Lab 02 – ACL Analytics Basics | CPE (1.5)
      • Lab 03 – Fraud Scandals of Note
      • Lab 04 – ACL Analytics Foundations (CPE) (ACL 101 V4 CPE)
      • Lab 05 – Remediating Issues & Reporting Results (CPE) (ACL 105 V1 CPE)
      • Lab 06 – ACL Analytics Introduction to Scripting (CPE) (ACL 106 V1 CPE)
      • Lab 07 – Basics of Datetime Fields Learning Series (Basic-Intermediate) (ACL 210)
      • Lab 08 – Basics of Datetime Fields Learning Series (Basic-Intermediate) (ACL 210) (Continued…)
  • Quizzes and Tests
    • Mid-Term Exam
    • Final Exam
  • Grading and Policies
  • WEBEX

MIS5208 Spring 2018

DATA ANALYTICS FOR IT AUDITORS AND CYBERSECURITY

You are here: Home / Archives for Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Social Media Fraud and the Real-World Effects

February 25, 2018 by Michelangelo C. Collura


Over the past several weeks, American news has been flooded with the revelation of a sophisticated disinformation campaign conducted by the Internet Research Agency, a company directed by a close ally of the Russian government. Of interest for fraud investigators is the use of social media to create social movements as a form of information warfare. Of particular note is the use of event pages. Investigators discovered the IRA used Facebook’s event creation and coordination capability to organize rallies for and against Donald Trump after his inauguration. The purpose of this was geopolitical in nature, but the technique could soon be seen amongst corporations, state governments and criminal organizations.

Consider a hacker group wishing to steal from Verizon. Causing physical disruption in the form of anti-telecom protests might be an effective way to disorient the management at a given location. This provides a potential avenue into theft of information or even physical assets. Perhaps in another example, a corporation is interested in starting operations in a given locality. By organizing anti-tax protests, they might gain leverage in negotiations. These possibilities show that using the power of groups – a time-honored political tool – can also be used for financial gain or simple disruption.

Security and fraud analysts should assess such risks when conducting an environmental assessment. Though this may seem less integral to the firm and thus less important, I would argue that the correct approach is one of vigilance, as the technique has been seen, and it has succeeded. Where the IRA perhaps started, many other governments and corporations will follow.

Defense One Article

 

Understanding fraud and its prevention

January 26, 2018 by Mahugnon B. Sohou

Studies have shows that the slightest change in the fraud triangle is the one thing that makes a difference between honest to dishonest behavior. When there is a perceived opportunity to get an unearned benefit there can be Fraud. The Fraudster is then tries to rationalize the behavior as acceptable. Ethics and fraud awareness training is the most effective way to prevent the fraud from happening. This shows all employees that the company takes Fraud really seriously, and how they should handle a case of fraud.

Internal controls has an important role in detecting Fraud. The preconditions for detecting frauds apply not only to auditors but to fraud investigators as well. A general knowledge of controls is still required for fraud investigators even though they only intervene when there is a case of known fraud. It is important to determine who can take advantage of control weaknesses opportunity. Audit managers know that it is equally important to make sure that management keeps a strong Fraud policy as it is to have strong control systems.

PwC Found Liable for $2B Colonial Bank Fraud

January 15, 2018 by Edward Ferrara

A judge rules the accounting firm failed to meet professional standards in its audits of Colonial’s mortgage warehouse lending division.

Matthew Heller
January 2, 2018 | CFO.com | US
Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) has been found liable in an accounting malpractice case that alleged it failed to detect the $2 billion fraud that led to one of the biggest bank collapses in history. The alleged fraud involved executives at Taylor, Bean & Whitaker, a defunct mortgage firm, and counterparts at Colonial Bank, an Alabama-based lender that supplied TBW with loans.
Recommended Stories:
  • PwC Fined $2M Over Indian Accounting Fraud
  • Kmart Fined $32.3 Million Over Rx Drug Fraud
  • Ex-Bankrate CFO Charged With Criminal Fraud

PwC gave the bank’s parent, Colonial BancGroup, a clean audit for years before it emerged that huge chunks of Colonial’s loans to TBW were secured against assets that did not exist. Colonial collapsed in August 2009.

In the malpractice case, U.S. District Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein agreed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation that PwC failed to meet professional accounting standards in its audits of Colonial. The FDIC sued the firm after incurring $2.8 billion from Colonial’s collapse.

“PwC did not design its audits to detect fraud and PwC’s failure to do so constitutes a violation of the auditing standards,” Rothstein ruled. The fraud, which centered in Colonial’s mortgage warehouse lending division, was orchestrated by Lee Bentley Farkas, the chairman of TBW, with the aid of Catherine Kissick, the head of the Colonial’s MWLD, and other Colonial employees. PwC said it was duped by Farkas, who skimmed millions of dollars from Colonial to buy a private jet, vintage cars and a vacation home. But Rothstein faulted PwC for, among other things, failing to inspect or even request to inspect the underlying documents for some TBW mortgages.

“PWC argues that even if it had attempted to inspect the underlying loan documents, it would not have uncovered the fraud because the fraudsters would simply have created fake documents,” Rothstein noted. “This, of course, is something that we will never know. However, what we do know is that Ms. Kissick, one of the key fraudsters, testified that if PWC had asked to see even just ten loan files ‘[t]he jig would be up.’” The case now moves into a damages phase, where the FDIC is seeking, according to one pre-trial document, as much as $2.1 billion.

Source: Heller, M. (2018). PwC Found Liable for $2B Colonial Bank Fraud. CFO.

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in