• Log In
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Syllabus
  • Course Structure
    • Required Texts and Readings
    • Grading and Other Policies
    • Course Schedule
  • Your Instructors
  • Schedule
    • Planning
      • Week 01 – Jan. 18, 2018
        • Week 01 – Written Assignment (WA-1.1)
        • Week 01 – Discussion
      • Week 02 – Jan. 25, 2018
        • Week 02 – Practical Assignment
        • Week 02 – Written Assignment
        • Week 02 – Discussion
      • Week 03 – Feb. 1, 2018
        • Week 03 – Practical Assignment
        • Week 03 – Written Assignment
        • Week 03 – Discussion
      • Week 04 – Feb. 8, 2018
        • Week 04 – Written Assignment
        • Week 04 – Discussion
    • Analysis
      • Week 05 – Feb, 15, 2018
        • Week 05 – Practical Assignment
        • Week 05 – Written Assignment
        • Week 05 – Discussion
      • Week 06 – Feb. 22, 2018
        • Week 06 – Practical Assignment
        • Week 06 – Written Assignment
      • Week 07 – Mar. 1, 2018
        • Week 7 – Practical Assignment
        • Week 7 – Written Assignment
        • Week 7 – Discussion
      • Week 8 – Mar. 15, 2018
        • Week 08 – Practical Assignment
        • Week 08 – Written Assignment
        • Week 08 – Discussion
      • Week 09 – Mar. 22, 2018
        • Week 09 – Practical Assignment
        • Week 09 – Written Assignment
        • Week 09 – Discussion
      • Week 10 – Mar. 29, 2018
        • PA 10.1: Practical Assignment 10
    • Design
      • Week 11 – Apr. 5, 2018
        • WA-11.1
      • Week 12 – Apr. 12, 2018
        • WA-12.1
        • WA-12.2
    • Implementation
      • Week 13 – Apr. 19, 2018
        • PA 13.1: Practical Assignment 13
        • WA-13.1
      • Week 14 – Apr. 26, 2018
        • PA 14.1: Practical Assignment 14
        • WA 14.1: Written Assignment 14
      • Week 15 – May 10, 2018
  • Webex
  • Gradebook

Systems and Infrastructure Life Cycle Management

MIS5203

Fox School of Business

Week 04 - Feb. 8, 2018 *UPDATED*

Week 4 – Discussion

February 8, 2018 by Mike Romeu 129 Comments

Abraham Maslow – the American psychologist better known for creating Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs – once stated: “I suppose it is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail.” I have certainly observed this phenomenon in more than one organization. Someone identifies a need and IT offers a computerized solution to address the need. What often happens is that in an effort to help the business IT takes an existing software solution and expands its capabilities. Usually this happens with applications that are highly configurable. Over time, the applications configuration becomes so extensive and complex that it becomes a burden.

Let me use an example to illustrate:

In an effort to support the Product Engineering organization’s goal to accelerate R&D and improve its chances for successful product launches, the IT organization decided to use an existing ERP platform to configure a number of “new” modules for product analytics. As you may know, ERP applications are very transactional in nature – process and order, issue the work order, manufacture the product, ship it to the customer, produce an invoice, collect payment. Even SAP and Oracle rely on Business Intelligence tools to run sales forecasts and perform data analysis.

Over time the ERP platform became bastardized. It became difficult to upgrade because of the amount of changes it went through and the Product Engineering organization became overly-reliant on the application, making it difficult to replace.

The company’s strategy throughout its 40-year history was one of making money buying and selling other organizations; they would buy a company and run it for its profit then sell it when it became no longer profitable. Ten years ago they decided to change their strategy; they divested from every business except medical devices. Whatever companies they were to buy would have to be one that either complemented or extended the company’s existing product lines. To execute this strategy the company had to be able to absorb newly-purchased organizations as quickly as possible.

If you were a member of the IT Strategic Development Team for the company, how would you align the IT organization’s strategy with that of the company’s?

Hint: think about IT processes, policies, procedures, services, standards, organization.

Primary Sidebar

Weekly Discussions

  • Uncategorized
  • Week 01 – Jan. 18, 2018
  • Week 02 – Jan. 25, 2018
  • Week 03 – Feb. 1, 2018
  • Week 04 – Feb. 8, 2018 *UPDATED*
  • Week 05 – Feb. 15, 2018
  • Week 07 – Mar. 1, 2018
  • Week 08 – Mar. 15, 2018
  • Week 09 – Mar. 22, 2018
  • Week 10 – Mar. 29, 2018
  • Week 11 – Apr. 5, 2018
  • Week 12 – Apr. 12, 2018
  • Week 13 – Apr. 19, 2018
  • Week 14 – Apr. 26, 2018
  • Week 15 – May 3, 2018

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in