-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 4 months ago
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, Weekly Question #7: Complete by March 27, 2017, on the site 9 years, 4 months ago
I really enjoyed this article and found it very interesting! Ideally, I think it is a great idea to address all 7 aspects in a performance review because I think it would help the boss-employee relationship. This method gets everything out in the open so the boss knows the employee’s goals and vice versa. As a professional that will be in this…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, The yellow cab is now a victim of a diruptive innovation , on the site 9 years, 4 months ago
I completely agree with everything Dan said- I’d be surprised if the taxi business will be what it once was. In order for the taxis to stay relevant and compete with services like Uber and Lyft, taxis need to look at why people prefer this services over taxis. Perhaps people find taxis safer and more reliable? Once taxis realize how these…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 4 months ago
-
Steph, this is a very interesting article. I love the question you asked where you wonder if Facebook is still at the forefront of innovation or have they peaked. As I was reading this, I thought it was interesting that Facebook, a social media company, would have an interest in the Internet of Things. Sometimes it’s difficult to say why one company might have an interest in an area totally unrelated to what they do. I thought this move looked desperate on their part and might be a sign that the “writing is on the wall” for Facebook. I then thought that perhaps Facebook is trying to continue doing what it sort-of already does-be everywhere. Perhaps Facebook is trying to expand on what we think social media is and is going after this social media “on steroids” approach where Facebook not only lets us comment on the things we use but control them too.
-
I definitely think that Facebook has the resources both financially and technologically to compete with the big tech companies ( Google, Amazon, Samsung, Apple) in the IoT market. Facebook makes its living on collecting and know its user’s information, and by entering the IoT market, they will be able to gather even more information from its users. Information such as daily habits (wake up, sleep, leave work, etc..) , eating habits, and schedule, Facebook would be able to use this information to market products or services for users. I do think that Facebook has peak as a social media network but has a company whose product is basically information, they are just getting started, with apps aim at businesses, drones and VR to come.
-
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, Tech Cravings, on the site 9 years, 5 months ago
As an avid Android user, I find this article very interesting because I don’t fully understand the attraction to Apple products. I never really thought about why people are attracted to Apple products, but after reading this, I think the author is onto something. Everything the author says makes sense, and Apple definitely does a great job of…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 5 months ago
After our class discussion yesterday on Integrative Thinking, I felt compelled to look at other articles about the topic. One article I found interesting is called “Cognitive Laziness Inhibits Creative […]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, Progress Report for Week Ending, March 1, on the site 9 years, 5 months ago
Honestly, I think if a hacker wants to get into something, they will find a way to do so. Therefore, I’m not sure if having all our home securities makes us a bigger target. Like we discussed in class, if a robber wants to get into a house, they would find a way to pick a lock or whatnot, so if home security eventually turns more and more…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 5 months ago
The article I’d like to discus today is called, How Uber’s Autonomous Cars Will Distroy 10 Million Jobs and Reshape the Economy by 2025. The author is Zack Kanter, an entrepreneur, who writes about several […]
-
Uber has revolutionized the world with its ability to identify a problem, and coming up with a technological solution just like the most recent of transportation industry. But the article targets Uber’s future plans of replacing the current cars with the driver less cars. The article sees this as an opportunity for Uber to replace all the taxicabs in the New York City. Even though credible sources such PWC predicts that autonomous could lead a reduction of cars up to 99%, but I personally think it is too early to make such claims. I wouldn’t want to travel in a driver-less car. I agree that disruptive innovation’s aim is to provide service that would minimize human effort, but having a driver less is too much to ask. But maybe with the time this might change, but at the moment I don’t see myself buying an autonomous car.
-
When it comes to the disruptive innovations we covered in class I believe that autonomous cars might have the possibility of becoming the most disruptive if they are successfully constructed. However, you make an interesting point about road regulations and this is also why I think autonomous cars might fail in taking over the car industry as a whole. As of now and probably within the next 10-15 years I don’t think it is even slightly feasible for these little Uber cars to take over the city. I don’t even think autonomous cars can become a real disruption until they are completely flawless in architecture, can better drive a car than a human, and are allowed on the road. I would like to think that I will never buy an autonomous vehicle, but as with any disruptive innovation it might become more practical to buy one in the next few decades. As we mentioned in class autonomous vehicles could definitely have some benefits. They could reduce accidents, drunk driving, traffic, and just make the road a safer place in general. Overall, I would agree with your opinion that we should take this with a grain a salt, despite the strong statistics. The effects of the autonomous vehicle really could be staggering, but before that is even a possibility these cars need to be flawless and affordable of course!
-
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, Progress Report for Week Ending, February 9, on the site 9 years, 5 months ago
As mobile technology and applications continue to grow, I definitely think the number of malicious mobile apps will increase in 2015. I feel like a lot of people take precautions on their computers when it comes to malware, but I think people forget to protect their smartphones because, in essence, a smartphone is a mini computer. I try to…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 6 months ago
I was just reading an article called, Samsung’s LoopPay: What it is, and why you should care.
This article basically describes what LoopPay is and discusses how it can compete against Apple Pay. LoopPay is […]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 6 months ago
I’ve recently just read an article called, Facebook lets members prepare for the digital beyond. It discusses how Facebook now has a new feature that allows users to appoint a “legacy contact” to administer their account when they die. The legacy contact has the power to:
Write a post above a memorialized timeline, which could be used, for example, to announce a memorial service or share a special message
Respond to new friend requests
Update the profile picture and cover photoIf members desire, they can also empower their legacy contact to download an archive of their public information — photos, posts and profile information. However, legacy contacts cannot log in as the deceased or look at the person’s private messages.
As an alternative to appointing a legacy contact, members can chose to have Facebook erase their accounts and everything in them.
The one problem with digital assets is that your heirs may not know and or are unable to access the accounts. Would you assign a legacy contact? How you make people aware of who your legacy contacts are? What do you think are some potential problems with having a legacy contact?
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, The Government and Social Media, on the site 9 years, 6 months ago
I agree with Michael in that one should always be mindful of the content someone posts online. However, as Americans we have freedom of speech so I do not think the Government should have the right to remove content. Its a little concerning that the Government can access our social media accounts, but I am not surprised. Even though my accounts…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, Amazon's New Transformational Project, on the site 9 years, 6 months ago
This is really interesting because, like you mentioned, Amazon is blamed for a lot of brick-and-mortar stores going out of business. I’m not sure how successful Amazon would be with this move. I think it’ll do well in that there can be a location for people to drop off and pick up packages. However, as for shopping, I’m not sure how well that…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 6 months ago
The article I read is called, Apple is preparing to give Spotify its first real competition. The article discusses how Apple’s digital music sales have fell as free or cheap competition grows. To adjust to the […]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, Who is excited about Super Bowl this Sunday? , on the site 9 years, 6 months ago
I am not really sure if social networking sites necessarily improve people’s lives, but I think social networking enhances entertainment experiences like the Super Bowl. From the looks of the article it appears that Facebook is essentially creating a hub for anyone who wants to talk about the Super Bowl. This enhances the experience of watching…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 6 months ago
Revenge of the laptop: HP, Dell, Samsung, show how light a laptop can get
The Article I just recently read discusses how companies like HP, Samsung, Dell are creating super light laptops to compete with the […]-
I believe many companies are trying to make everything skinner and faster. Speed and mobility is key for companies and users. Phones are now introduced with Finger Print scanners which is safer and faster for users. Many companies are competing in the tablet industy because this is a key market. Still, the markey potencial is high and I believe making laptop thinner they can capture a good portion of the tablet market. Now many laptops are touch screen and can fold to become a tablet. And the new MacBook Air is 24 percent thinner and its only 2 pounds. With the smaller logic board which helped Macbook make it smaller. I feel like this is going to happen every industry. If you remember the cell phone industry, phones used to so big and fat and then the industry has progessed to become thinner and thinner. I still remember when the Motorola razer came and how crazy people went and now we have iPhone 6 and its still getting slimmer
-
-
Stephanie A Kilroy commented on the post, Progress Report for Week Ending, September 29, on the site 9 years, 6 months ago
I really liked this article as well. I think its a great thing to think about as we are all brainstorming and trying to come up with a solution to a business problem. As students and about to be professionals, this class is preparing us for the mindset and the work we could potentially encounter after we graduate. With that said, I think all…[Read more]
-
Stephanie A Kilroy and
Sung Sik Choi are now friends 9 years, 7 months ago
-
Stephanie A Kilroy wrote a new post on the site MIS4596 Section 2 Spring 2015 9 years, 7 months ago
Microsoft Announces Windows 10
Back in September, Microsoft announced their newest version of their operating system, Windows 10. It will basically be a mix of Windows 7 and 8 with a few new features. Some of the features in Windows 10 will include: redesigned start menu, allowance to work on multiple desktops, and the ability to run the operating system on different screens such as a computer, tablet or smartphone. Although I was an early adopter to Windows 8, I am looking forward to using the new Windows 10 because of the new start menu that is similar to Windows 7 in that it does not go into a whole new window when pressed, and I am excited to try the “Snap Assist” which will allow you to work with multiple desktops; I think a lot of people will find value in this feature. I am curious to see what you all think about Windows 10? Do you think users will have difficulty adjusting to Windows 10 like many did with 8?
-
I agree with you that this unveil of Windows 10 will be welcomed with open arms across industries. It is becoming ever important to have a multiple desktop feature to help business men and women who travel frequently. This functionality will improve the way employees share data and will make aligning business objectives much easier. It is also a huge plus that the software will run the same on a tablet that it will on a desktop. This will make business decision making easier when “on the go”.
-
I am very happy to see someone post articles about Windows 10.
This brings me back in memories of when I adapted Windows 7 and 8. The upgrade of Windows is huge impacts on society such as businesses and schools. Especially, the ‘Snap Assist’ will allows us to share programs and be able to set-up all platforms into one product. This idea is sensational for all other technologies and I strong believe that people will easily adapt this feature. I want to see how Windows will launching this new features into new technologies. -
I’m not really sure what to think of Windows 10. I have yet to switch to 8 myself because I’ve used it enough to know that it’s not useful for my purposes, so I hope that 10 reverts back to the classic Windows interface. If Microsoft can pull that off and implement some new non-intrusive features then I think a lot of people will be inclined to make the switch, and will do so with little difficulty. If done correctly, I think Snap Assist will be a great feature, one that will attract consumers. However, Microsoft has had difficulty with synchronization among several platforms. They have tried to do something like this with previous iterations of Windows and have tried cross-system interaction with the PC and Xbox systems, but largely these connections were unstable and weren’t used. It sounds like Snap Assist offers more useful synchronization than previously though, so it it might work out. I’m anxious to see how Windows 10 turns out and as of right now I’d say I’m likely to purchase it.
-
-
Stephanie A Kilroy and
Bruce Hohne are now friends 9 years, 7 months ago
- Load More
I think this is a very interesting topic, especially because it is so relevant to all of us. I have personally become one of those millennials that has given up the cable ecosystem to use products like Xfinity, Netflix, and Hulu. As is true with any disruption, I feel like this is too hard to predict because it is very dependent upon the individual. I personally believe I will return to the cable ecosystem as an adult because that is what I’m used to. I think the opposite of Moffett and believe that having children will cause me to return back to the cable ecosystem, because I had cable as a child. However, this is only my opinion. Everyone is different and I am sure that not everyone will feel the need to return to the cable ecosystem. In order to stay competitive I believe that cable companies need to offer things that streaming services cannot, especially for families that have different needs then the individual. More options is one thing, but presenting more options in real time seems important. From my experiences sometimes I just can’t stand waiting the next few days for a certain show to stream. It is hard to say what will happen to the cable ecosystem in the future. While I do prefer streaming, I would like to hope that cable will still be an option.
I agree with Craig Moffett that many millennials will not come back to the cable ecosystem because now that they know and use services such as Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, and other streaming services, their perceived value of cable has diminish to a point where it is no longer worth it regardless of how much money they make. According to the consumerist, customers only regularly watch 18 channels out of the 180 that they pay for, paying for a service that you are only use 10% of is not a good investment. In order to get the millennials to come back, the cable companies should use a “a la carte” model where customer only pay for channels they want, this would lower the price and make it more appealing to customers.
I also agree with Craig Moffett that Millenials will stick to over the top services as sources for television. This year I started using Google Chromecast to access services such as Netflix and stream other services such as HBO GO, Starz, Showtime, etc. I don’t see any drawbacks and find it beneficial since I do not have to pay for channels that I do not watch. In fact, for many shows it is significantly easier to watch through these services since the viewer does not have to deal with commercials. The only instance in which I can see millennials going back to subscription is because of kids. Toddlers will most likely not know what they specifically want to watch and the parents may not be sure either. In this instance, this subscription cable holds an advantage. Otherwise, I don’t think many millennials will re-enter subscription tv.